The organisation of thought, educational and scientificWhitehead, Alfred North
Philosophy
The organisation of thought, educational and scientific
Whitehead, Alfred North
Education
Let us now suppose that V has this peculiar value: that is, if we look
on this value V as known, we must suppose that β is given by the second
of the above formulæ.
The other condition allows P and S to be put in the forms
P = -β_v_/λV^2, S = β/λ,
where
V′ = λV.
Thus we have the bundle of formulæ
β^2 = 1/(1 - _v_^2/V^2),
T = β{_t_ - _vx_/V^2}/λ,
V′ = λV.
The value which we give to λ is purely a matter for the adjustment of
units. If we want A and B to agree in their judgments of the magnitude
of this peculiar muzzle-velocity, we put λ = 1.
We then get the formulæ usually adopted, namely
β^2 = 1/(1 - _v_^2/V^2), }
T = β{_t_ - _vx_/V^2}, } (II)
V′ = V. }
But if we prefer that A and B should reckon (according to A's judgment)
in the same units of time, we put λ = β, and obtain
β^2 = 1/(1 - _v_^2/V^2),
T = (_t_ - _vx_)/V^2,
V′ = βV.
But A and B are in any case in such hopeless difficulties over their
comparisons of time-judgments that the detail of using the same units
does not help them much. Accordingly the formulæ marked (II) are those
used. Thus A and B agree in their judgments as to the magnitude of one
special velocity V, whatever may be the direction in which the entity
possessing it is moving.
In order to reach this measure of agreement, they have to disagree as
to their space judgments and their time judgments. The root cause of
their disagreement is their diverse judgment as to which axis system is
to be taken at rest for the purpose of measuring velocities.
Before discussing the nature of the disagreement disclosed in formula
(II), let us ask why we should bring these difficulties on our heads by
supposing that two people in relative motion, who both (for the purpose
of measuring velocities) assume that they are at rest, should agree in
their judgments in respect to this special velocity V.
Such an agreement has no counterpart in any of our obvious judgments
made from railway carriages. Surely we can wait till the contingency
occurs before discussing the confusion which it creates.
But the contingency has occurred. It occurs when we consider the
velocity of light. Perhaps I may venture to remind a philosophical
society that light moves so very quickly that it is difficult to
consider its velocity at all. So we need not be surprised that this
peculiar fact concerning its velocity is not more obvious.
Now V being the velocity of light, unless _v_ is large, _v_/V
(and still more _v_^2/V^2) will be quite inappreciable. The only
velocity ready to hand which is big enough to give _v_/V an
appreciable value is the velocity of the earth in its orbit.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account