The organisation of thought, educational and scientificWhitehead, Alfred North
Philosophy
The organisation of thought, educational and scientific
Whitehead, Alfred North
Education
It is an interesting subject to investigate exactly what are the
fundamental uniformities of experience which necessitate this
conclusion. It is not so easy as it looks, since we have to divest
ourselves of all aid of scientific hypothesis if our conclusions are to
be demonstrative.
_Relativity in Modern Physics_
Pp. 201-202, "Owing to the fact ... which B so regards."
The fundamental formulæ for the theory of relativity are the relations
between diverse co-ordinate systems given on p. 203, and formulæ II
at the bottom of p. 207. The general explanation of one method in
which these formulæ arise--namely, Einstein's method--is given on
pp. 201-211. Namely, we seek the condition that for all dynamical
axes the velocity of light should be the same, and the same in all
directions. It should be noted that the experiments which, so far as
they go, confirm these formulæ, can also be explained in another way
which makes the theory of relativity unnecessary. We need only ascribe
to the ether a certain property of contraction in the direction of
motion, and the thing is done. So no one need be bludgeoned into
accepting the rather bizarre doctrine of relativity, nor indeed any
other scientific generalisation. The good old homely ether, which we
all know, can in this case serve the purpose. Just as an author of
genius, if he lives long enough, survives the inevitable accusation
of immorality, so the ether by dint of persistence has outlived all
reputation of extravagance. But if we detach ourselves from the glib
phraseology concerning it, the scientific ether is uncommonly like the
primitive explanation of the soul, as a little man inside us, which can
sometimes be caught escaping in the form of a butterfly. As soon as the
ether has to be patched up with special properties to explain special
experiments, its scientific use is problematical, and its philosophic
use is _nil_.
Philosophically the ether seems to me to be an ambitious attempt
to give a complete explanation of the physical universe by making
an elephant stand on a tortoise. Scientifically it has a perfectly
adequate use by veiling the extremely abstract character of scientific
generalisations under a myth, which enables our imaginations to work
more freely. I am not advocating the extrusion of ether from our
scientific phraseology, even though at special points we have to
abandon it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account