The origin and development of the atomic theoryShipley, Maynard
History
The origin and development of the atomic theory
Shipley, Maynard
Atomic theory
In 1805, he extended his atomic hypothesis to the explanation of
chemical phenomena. His first postulate was, of course, that all
matter is made up of small particles; these he found possessed the
power of attracting (and holding) other particles. He therefore
concluded that these invisible particles never subdivide in taking part
in chemical changes, and that all atoms of any one element must be
alike. But the atoms of the different elements vary in weight, form and
combining power. He established the rule, already assumed by William
Higgins (1789), that different atoms tend to combine in the proportion
of atom to atom.
When a compound was composed of two elements only, it was presumed to
be binary; that is, since water, for example, was known to be composed
of hydrogen and oxygen, it was supposed by Dalton that it _must_
consist of one atom of each of these elements; as was also assumed in
the case of ammonia, which he knew to be a combination of hydrogen and
nitrogen. Now we know that one atom of hydrogen combined with one atom
of oxygen forms, not water, but oxide of hydrogen; while the combining
of _two_ atoms of hydrogen with one atom of oxygen forms water.
Dalton established the fact that elements combine only in _definite
proportions_--e.g., that oxygen and hydrogen will combine only in
the _proportion_ of 8 to 1. Had Dalton known that a molecule
of water contains _two_ atoms of hydrogen, and _one_ of
oxygen, he would have known that _one_ atom of oxygen must weigh
_sixteen_ times--instead of eight times--as much as one atom of
hydrogen. _One part_ of hydrogen _by weight_ does combine
with _eight parts by weight_ of oxygen, but this does not prove
that the portion of hydrogen in water contains only one atom. Since
it contains two atoms, instead of one, then, in order to preserve the
relative combining (or “equivalent”) weights of the two substances,
we must assume that the _atomic_ weight of oxygen is 16, for
the _combining_ weights of elements represent the relative (not
actual) weights of the atoms. And each element has its own fixed
combining weight, ascertained by experiment.
Water, then, is not a mere mixture or combination of hydrogen and
oxygen, in the sense that a pound of hydrogen and eight _and a
half_ pounds of oxygen will, when exploded, produce 9½ pounds of
water. Combination would indeed be effected, but there would be a
residue in the container of just one-half pound of oxygen. The mass of
oxygen that has combined will weigh exactly eight times as much as the
hydrogen; and now we know that the water formed will contain exactly
twice as many atoms of hydrogen as there are oxygen atoms present in
the combination, uniting not only “one by one,” but, in this case, two
to one. What the law of definite proportions proves is that chemical
combinations always take place _between atoms_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account