It is known that in the Aryan languages some of the oldest words are
without gender; speaking grammatically, pater is not a masculine,
nor mater a feminine; nor do the oldest words for river, mountain,
tree, or sky, disclose any outward sign of grammatical gender. But
though without any signs of gender, all ancient nouns expressed
activity. The distinction of gender began, not with the introduction
of masculine nouns, but with the setting apart of certain derivative
suffixes for feminine words; thus when _bona_ was introduced, _bonus_
became masculine; when _puella_ could be applied to a girl, _puer_,
which formerly meant both boy and girl, became restricted to the
meaning of boy. Therefore, whenever it happens that we have a female
representative of a natural phenomenon by the side of a male, the
female may almost always be taken as the later form. This rule, which
has been strictly applied to the name of Dyaus, dates from so remote a
time that its origin is lost in the mists of ages.
Dyaus, like _deva_, shining, comes from the root _div_ or _dyu_, but
this root bifurcates at once. In the Rig-Veda forms derived from the
base _div_ are masculine or feminine as the case may be, whilst those
which are derived from _dyu_ are always masculine; thus _dyaus_ from
_div_, is the firmament, the expanse above our heads, and is the later
feminine form; whereas _dyaus_ from _dyu_, is the sky considered as
a power, an active force, and is masculine, and consequently is the
earlier conception. These two words, _dyaus_, nominative singular, and
its base, _dyu_, being almost synonymous may be used indifferently.
All vegetable cells are destined to become plants, though sometimes
different plants, this, observation of nature teaches us. All verbal
cells are destined to become words, though differing, that is, with
different meanings; the small amount of philological study to which we
have already devoted ourselves in these pages shows us this. All cells,
whatever their nature, possess a transitive movement; the French word
_éclater_ has the meaning of to disperse in brilliancy; if we imagine
scintillations of light escaping from a central luminary we obtain the
idea of a transitive luminous movement. Whilst a cell preserves its
primary condition it is not possible to predict its future; no human
intelligence could have foretold that the root _div_ and _dyu_ would
produce the Sanscrit word deva, which means to shine, and deva would
in time develop into deus, which now no longer means to shine, but God.
It is a curious characteristic of Vedic Sanscrit that this uncertainty
of meaning of such words as deva, which expresses equally the half
physical and half spiritual intention, is an evidence of its rays
having proceeded from the same source of light and heat.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account