But why, it may be asked, was Daphne supposed to have been changed
into a laurel-tree? The dawn was called daphne, the burning; so was
the laurel--as wood that burns easily, and whose flame throws a bright
light--two different objects, but alike under one aspect, though two
distinct acts. The root _dah_ is found in daphne for laurel equally
with Daphne, dawn, the synonymy of the two names producing the myth of
Daphne. Although this legend first came to life on Greek soil, it would
have been unintelligible without the help of the Veda, as the later
Sanscrit supplied no key to it.
The Sanscrit root _Ah_ is also the germ of the name of Athena, the
termination of the name corresponding to Ahana; Athene is said to
spring from the head of Zeus. This extraordinary birth, though
post-Homeric, is no doubt of ancient date, since it repeats exactly
the birth of Ahana. The Hellenists maintain that the Greeks were
unconscious that the word Athene meant the dawn; doubtless few amongst
them knew that Zeus originally meant the surface or forehead of the
sky. It is also true that when the people of Athens worshipped Athene
as their tutelary deity, she became something very different from the
Indian Ushas; but if we notice carefully all the many and various ideas
concerning this Greek goddess, we shall be led to the supposition that
her cradle was no other than that of the dawn, namely, the east, the
forehead of the sky, or Zeus. Neither in the Veda, nor in Homer, is
there any mention of the mother of the dawn, although both mention _her
parents_.
It is a curious fact that in the mythology of Italy, Minerva, who was
identical with Athene, should from the beginning have assumed a name
apparently expressive of the intellectual rather than the physical
character of the Dawn-goddess. Minerva or Menerva is clearly connected
with _mens_, the Greek _menos_, the Sanscrit _manas_, mind; _mane_
in Latin is morning; _manare_ is specially used of the rising sun;
and _matuta_, another name of the same category, is the Dawn. The
root _man_, which in all Aryan languages means thought, was at a very
early time, like the Sanscrit _budh_, destined to express the revived
consciousness of the whole of nature at the approach of the light of
the morning. The equation Ahane = Athene is both phonetically and
mythologically irreproachable, the correlative Minerva can also be
explained mythologically.
To reject the explanations of these myths which Comparative Philology
furnishes, it would be necessary to prove that Ahana and Eos do not
mean the dawn, that Athene does not correspond with Ahana, and that
Helios is not the sun.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account