We must also notice that the creators of this name having connected
it with the loftiest thing of which they could conceive--thought--did
not stop there; the sight of what was lowest--the dust--inspired them
with another name, _homo_ = earth-born; this Latin word having the
same source as _humus_ = the soil. Our fathers also gave themselves
a third name, which was _brotos_ in Greek, _mortalis_ in Latin, and
_marta_--the dying--in Sanscrit; they could hardly have applied the
word mortal to themselves if they had not at the same time believed in
other beings who did not die.
And this strange fact has come to pass, that on our planet there
existed in former days men--simple mortals as they were--who
manipulated thought, incorporating it with language, the only domain
in which it can exist; then these marvellous men so entirely eclipsed
themselves, and passed out of our ken, that their posterity do not
recognise them under their modest garb of anonymity; for their work
though still living through thousands of centuries, is so unrecognised
that men ask themselves, “Why is it not possible to think apart from
words?”
Thus we acknowledge the profound wisdom of the conceptions of our
ancestors; but their understanding worked unequally, on certain points
it was very advanced, but on others behindhand.
In following the march of human intellect in the past, we are struck
by the slowness with which thought and speech co-operated. As long as
our ancestors had no occasion to speak of the action of covering a
surface with a liquid or soft substance, they did not possess the word
_var_ = to cover; “the name of colour in Sanscrit is _varna_, clearly
derived from this word; and not till the art of painting, in its most
primitive form, was discovered and named, could there have been a name
for colour.” For some time they continued to view various objects
differently coloured without distinguishing the tints; it is well known
that the distinction of colours is of late date; our ancestors gazed on
the blue sky, or the green trees, as in a dream, without recognising
blue or green, as long as they lacked words to define the two colours,
and some time elapsed before they particularised the colours by giving
each its proper title.
We speak of the seven colours of the rainbow, because the intermediate
tints elude us; the ancients acted much in the same way, Xenophanes
speaks of the rainbow as a cloud of purple, red, and yellow; Aristotle
also speaks of the tri-coloured rainbow, red, yellow, and green; and
Democritus seems only to have mentioned black, white and yellow.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account