Archaeology; Civilization, Ancient; Despotism; Greece -- History -- To 146 B.C.; Wealth
It is not improbable that Sethon belonged to the same family as
Psammetichus, or at any rate that he was one of his predecessors on the
throne of Sais. As starting-point for identifying him we have two facts.
He was high priest of Ptah and he was alive in 701 B.C. A generation
earlier the title Sem of Ptah was borne by Tafnekht, the chief of Sais
from about 749 to 721 B.C.[508] who led the Delta in its struggle
against the Ethiopian Pianchi[509]. A generation after Sethon the
Assyrian cylinders[510] describe Necho I (672–664 B.C.) the father of
Psammetichus I as king not only of Sais but also of Memphis, the home of
the Sethon tradition. A whole line of Saite rulers may be traced from
Tafnekht onwards to Psammetichus I[511]. All of these kings seem to have
been something more than mere local rulers. The Pianchi stele makes it
plain that Tafnekht aimed at becoming king at least of the whole of
Lower Egypt. Bocchoris, the solitary king of the XXIVth dynasty, has
been discussed already. Stephinates, Nechepsus, and Necho I appear in
Africanus[512] as the first three kings of dynasty XXVI, Psammetichus I
coming fourth on the list. This statement is not discredited by the fact
that other writers[513] begin the dynasty with Psammetichus, while
Eusebius[514] puts Stephinates second, after Ammeris the Ethiopian. The
three versions need not be mutually exclusive. Psammetichus was
unquestionably the first of the Saites to win for his house the
undisputed kingship of all Egypt. Hence the position generally assigned
to him. In another way too he represented a new departure dynastically.
He appears to have had family connexions with Ethiopia, and to have
consistently aimed at an entente with the Ethiopian royal house[515],
who may have originally left him a free hand in the Delta from the
desire to put a buffer state between Ethiopia and Assyria. Ammeris
appears to be a Greek form of (Ta) Nut-Amen, Rud-Amen, or Amen-Rud, as
the last of the Ethiopian kings is variously called[516]. His appearance
at the head of the XXVIth dynasty is a record of its Ethiopian
connexions at this time[517]. Africanus on the other hand, following
Manetho, who was himself an Egyptian, records Psamtek’s ancestry in the
direct line, and regards them, rather than any Ethiopian or Assyrian
conquerors, as the lawful kings of the whole country[518].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account