The PanGerman Plot Unmasked: Berlin's formidable peace-trap of "the drawn war"Chéradame, André
History
The PanGerman Plot Unmasked: Berlin's formidable peace-trap of "the drawn war"
Chéradame, André
Europe -- Politics and government -- 1871-1918; Pangermanism; World War, 1914-1918
Mr. Dietrich Schaefer, the well-known historian, in the Review _Panther_,
affirmed, early in February, 1915: “It is absolutely necessary for us
to expand the sphere of our power, especially eastward ... the immense
Russian force must recede behind the Dnieper” (quoted by _L’Information_,
5th February, 1915).
A Swedish pamphlet, ascribed to the Germanophile, Adrian Molin,
explained, also early in 1915, that Germany, with the help of Sweden,
was to have given the finishing stroke in separating Russia from Europe
by means of a barrier formed of Buffer-States, to wit, Finland and
the Ukraine. Now, for the last twenty-five years in particular, the
Pangerman agents have endeavoured to sow the seeds of rebellion among
the 20 millions of Small-Russians who live in the Russian Governments
grouped around Kieff. Finally, the Moslem regions of Russia (Caucasus,
Central Asia, etc.) were to form special States under the sway of
Turkish suzerainty, and, through that channel, to bear the yoke of German
influence.
[Illustration: THE GERMAN CLAIMS IN THE EAST.]
Such were the means elaborated at Berlin to bring about the annihilation
of Russia as a great power, when once her armies had been destroyed;
and this might have happened perhaps, if the English intervention, by
enabling France to make a stand, had not prevented Germany from first
smashing France and then concentrating all her forces against the Empire
of the Tsar, in accordance with the plan of the General Staff of Berlin.
We can form an estimate of the annexations which Germany, as late as
the beginning of 1916, still hoped to effect at the cost of Russia by
examining the memorial of May 20th, 1915, addressed to the Imperial
Chancellor; although the phraseology in which it is drawn up aims at
concealing the full extent of the Pangerman demands, it yet tallies, in
its tendencies, with the programme published by Tannenberg in 1911:
“With regard to the East,” says that memorial, “the following
consideration must guide us: For the great increase of industrial
power which we expect in the West we must secure a counterpoise by the
annexation of an agricultural territory of equal value in the East.
It is necessary to strengthen the agricultural basis of our national
economy; to secure room for the expansion of a great German agricultural
settlement; to restore to our Empire the German peasants living in a
foreign land, particularly in Russia, who are now actually without the
protection of the law; finally, we must increase considerably the number
of our fellow countrymen able to bear arms; all these matters require an
important extension of the frontiers of the Empire and of Prussia towards
the East through the annexation of at least some parts of the Baltic
provinces and of territories to the South of them, while keeping in view
the necessity of a military defence of the Eastern German frontier.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account