The Paper Currency of England Dispassionately Considered: With Suggestions Towards a Practical Solution of the Difficulty — John Shaqi
The Paper Currency of England Dispassionately Considered: With Suggestions Towards a Practical Solution of the DifficultyHaslam, John (of Dublin)
History
The Paper Currency of England Dispassionately Considered: With Suggestions Towards a Practical Solution of the Difficulty
Haslam, John (of Dublin)
Currency question -- Great Britain
limits, except in cases of undoubted necessity, and for this purpose
less than 4 per cent. could not be considered adequate. Indeed the Bank
rate of interest so frequently rises higher than 4 per cent. that the
imposition of any lower rate would present little barrier to the issue
in excess of £22,000,000. The three rates therefore, the minimum, the
medium, and the maximum, might very reasonably be fixed at 1, 2, and 4
per cent. respectively; in other words, the Bank should be authorized
to issue the first £11,000,000 of its unrepresented notes at 1 per
cent. the second £11,000,000 at 2 per cent. and any notes issued in
excess of those £22,000,000 at 4 per cent.
There is one explanation, however, that must be made as to the
method in which these rates should be imposed. We have said that the
respective rates should be levied on the amount of notes that might
be actually in the hands of the public. To this plan it may, perhaps,
be objected, that inasmuch as a very considerable portion of the
deposits in the Bank of England are well known to be as profitable to
the Bank, and to operate as currency just as much as if they continued
in the hands of the public; and that, as under our proposed system,
the Bank will be enabled to re-loan their whole amount, and thereby
derive a two-fold profit upon a large proportion of the notes in
actual circulation--that, therefore, consistency would require that
the notes in deposit should be considered chargeable just the same as
if they had never been deposited. Now, it must be conceded, that this
objection is not altogether void of force; but there is an overruling
consideration on the other side of the question. For it must not be
forgotten that the Bank of England, in common with other banks, is
necessarily a bank of deposit, and has its legitimate functions as
such; a very considerable part of the profit, therefore, derived from
the re-issue of the notes deposited, is exclusively the result of the
constitutional exercise of its functions, and lies entirely beyond
the sphere of Governmental jurisdiction. It might not, perhaps, be
impossible to devise a test for distinguishing between these profits
and those arising more directly out of the privilege of issue; but
such a distinction would be far too minute to serve as a basis for
legislation; and on the other hand, any indiscriminate charge upon the
deposits, as a whole, would not only be extremely vexatious, but would
even place the Bank of England at a serious disadvantage as compared
with every other bank of deposit. It follows, therefore, that while
the rule already laid down, of confining the operation of the rates to
the actual amount of notes in the hands of the public, may not attain
to absolute theoretical perfection, yet in practice it is clearly
preferable to any regulation that would either discriminate between two
classes of profits derived from the deposits, or impose the rates upon
their total amount.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account