m. | 3.71 | 12,550
12 p. m. | 3.66 | 12,300
15. 6.30 a. m. | 3.50 | 11,525
1 p. m. | 3.41 | 11,050
6.30 p. m. | 3.41 | 11,050
16. 6.30 a. m. | 3.00 | 9,125
1 p. m. | 3.00 | 9,125
6.30 p. m. | 2.91 | 8,700
17. 6.30 a. m. | 2.5 | 6,900
1 p. m. | 2.5 | 6,900
6.30 p. m. | 2.5 | 6,900
18. 6.30 a. m. | 2.5 | 6,900
1 p.m. | 2.41 | 6,500
6.30 p. m. | 2.33 | 6,200
19. 6.30 a. m. | 2 | 4,900
1 p. m. | 2 | 4,900
6.30 p. m. | 2 | 4,900
DAMAGES.
GENERAL STATEMENTS.
Estimates of flood damages are always approximations only. It is
possible to determine with a fair degree of assurance the cost of
replacing structures which have been carried away, to estimate the value
of goods destroyed--especially if they be commodities stored in shops or
warehouses--to calculate the amount of operatives' wages lost, and in
the case of general mercantile business to estimate the damages incurred
through consequent reduction of trade. Destruction by flood, however
vast, is incomplete. It differs materially from destruction by fire, for
often destructible property is of value after floods have passed.
Buildings which are inundated still retain value, and many kinds of
merchandise are not totally destroyed. Therefore when the amount of
damages is calculated there is always to be taken into consideration the
fact that a part of the material which has been flooded can be
reclaimed, and retains some proportion, at least, of the value which it
had previously possessed. Furthermore, damages by flood enter into
practically every detail of social and business affairs. There are
losses which are severe to one or more persons, and which can not be
appreciated except by those whom the floods have actually overtaken.
Therefore estimations of flood damages can be only approximate, and
while a measure of accuracy may be reached with respect to a part of the
losses, there remains a necessity for approximation which can not be
classed with carefully computed damages along other lines.
HIGHLAND TRIBUTARIES.
Along the three northern tributaries, the Ramapo, Wanaque, and Pequanac,
and at their confluence with the Pompton, the destruction by flood
waters was far greater than along the Rockaway, Whippany, and upper
Passaic, or in that area described as the Central Basin. In the drainage
areas of the three tributaries last mentioned the waters were higher
than in the flood of 1902, but the general effects were of the same
nature, and consisted principally of flooded lands, houses, and
washouts. There were few radical cases of complete destruction like
those which marked the course of the flood in the northern tributaries.
The principal interest is therefore confined to the Pompton and the
three highland tributaries which discharge into it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account