The effectiveness of a reservoir built upon the lines proposed in
the case of Great Piece Meadow depends upon the adjustment of
outflow so that the channel below will not be overborne, while at
the same time sufficient storage capacity is afforded to hold
temporarily the water which enters above the dam in amount greater
than the carrying capacity of the outflow apertures. The dam across
Passaic River above Little Falls would be provided with apertures
which would discharge 12,000 cubic feet per second under the
maximum head in the storage basin. As the flood rises these
apertures would discharge a constantly increasing amount of water
to the maximum, and for a considerable time thereafter the maximum
would be maintained, the discharge decreasing after the flood
according to the height of water remaining in the reservoir.
[Footnote D: Includes water discharged through fixed openings for a
flood similar to that of October, 1903. Maximum flow, 12,000 cubic feet
per second.]
_Estimated cost of Mountain View Reservoir._
[Elevation of flow line, 202 feet. Storage of 8 inches on watershed.]
Earth excavation:
Stripping dam base, 83,500 cubic yards, at $0.30 $25,050
Core wall trench, 24,900 cubic yards, at $1 24,900
Rock excavation, 10,100 cubic yards, at $2 20,200
Rock fill in dam, 197,000 cubic yards, at $1.25 246,250
Rubble masonry, 23,200 cubic yards, at $5 116,000
Concrete, 30,000 cubic yards, at $6 180,000
Gate chambers and tunnels 65,000
Reconstruction of highways 142,400
Reconstruction of railroads 815,000
Real estate 1,360,000
----------
2,994,800
Engineering and contingencies 325,200
----------
3,320,000
Protection of Newark pipe line 20,000
----------
Total cost 3,340,000
[Same for elevation of flow line, 204 feet. Storage of 9 inches on
watershed.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account