The passing of the great race; or, The racial basis of European historyGrant, Madison
History
The passing of the great race; or, The racial basis of European history
Grant, Madison
Ethnology -- Europe
Mankind emerged from savagery and barbarism under the leadership of
selected individuals whose personal prowess, capacity or wisdom gave
them the right to lead and the power to compel obedience. Such leaders
have always been a minute fraction of the whole, but as long as the
tradition of their predominance persisted they were able to use the
brute strength of the unthinking herd as part of their own force and
were able to direct at will the blind dynamic impulse of the slaves,
peasants or lower classes. Such a despot had an enormous power at his
disposal which, if he were benevolent or even intelligent, could be used
and most frequently was used for the general uplift of the race. Even
those rulers who most abused this power put down with merciless rigor
the antisocial elements, such as pirates, brigands or anarchists, which
impair the progress of a community, as disease or wounds cripple an
individual.
True aristocracy or a true republic is government by the wisest and
best, always a small minority in any population. Human society is like a
serpent dragging its long body on the ground, but with the head always
thrust a little in advance and a little elevated above the earth. The
serpent’s tail, in human society represented by the antisocial forces,
was in the past dragged by sheer strength along the path of progress.
Such has been the organization of mankind from the beginning, and such
it still is in older communities than ours. What progress humanity can
make under the control of universal suffrage, or the rule of the
average, may find a further analogy in the habits of certain snakes
which wiggle sideways and disregard the head with its brains and eyes.
Such serpents, however, are not noted for their ability to make rapid
progress.
A true republic, the function of which is administration in the
interests of the whole community—in contrast to a pure democracy, which
in last analysis is the rule of the demos or a majority in its own
interests—should be, and often is, the medium of selection for the
technical task of government of those best qualified by antecedents,
character and education, in short, of experts.
To use another simile, in an aristocratic as distinguished from a
plutocratic or democratic organization the intellectual and talented
classes form the point of the lance while the massive shaft represents
the body of the population and adds by its bulk and weight to the
penetrative impact of the tip. In a democratic system this concentrated
force is dispersed throughout the mass. It supplies, to be sure, a
certain amount of leaven but in the long run the force and genius of the
small minority is dissipated, and its efficiency lost. _Vox populi_, so
far from being _Vox Dei_, thus becomes an unending wail for rights and
never a chant of duty.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account