The pedigree of fascism : $b A popular essay on the Western philosophy of politicsLion, Aline
Philosophy
The pedigree of fascism : $b A popular essay on the Western philosophy of politics
Lion, Aline
Italy -- Politics and government -- 1914-1945; Partito nazionale fascista (Italy); Political science; State, The
The several Treaties of peace, the conferences of the Allies, were
a long sequence of disappointments to the people of Italy. The
incomprehension of the real state of things in that country reached
such a degree that had Socialism in Italy been endowed with a more
violent vitality Bolshevism would have flourished. The propaganda of
the Socialist party increased daily on ground most favourably prepared
by the general discontent and received moreover the collaboration
of the so-called _Popolari_—a kind of Social Catholic party that in
theory was to take the place of the clericals. Whether their leader,
Don Sturzo, a man of remarkable power, realised the sacrilegiousness
of using Catholic priests to pervert the minds of the peasants or not,
the Popolari brought their violences to such a pitch in some provinces
that they not only matched, they surpassed the Reds.[4] Naturally,
these parties and the men who were not supposed to belong to them, but
were flattering them in case of an eventual revolution, were wont to
represent the war and the sacrifices that had been made by the country
as the cause of all the social and economic difficulties. To them,
the only consequence of the war was the destruction of what had been
laboriously done between 1870 and 1915.
It was at this juncture that some people banded together their
aspirations, which seemed in the main to be the realisation in the
Adriatic of all the value of what they called “their mutilated
victory.” They had mostly been in the trenches, and they clustered
round Gabriele d’Annunzio who led them to occupy Fiume, which was
still under the control of the Allies. The Allies left the whole
affair to Italy and had the Italian government, or a strong party,
backed d’Annunzio and his friends, the course of events would have
been different. The country wanted Fiume, certainly, but with what
will did they want it? With a will that was national at last, because
it was not moved exclusively by Irredentism, and did not identify
itself with the will of the upper classes, but was a feeling with
the whole people. They had deserved it; they were conscious of a
right acquired through the common trial of the whole nation. It was,
however, more a velleity than a will. The new spiritual life was
quivering, it could express itself in a puerile gesture of the hand
towards the object of its passion, but it could not yet express itself
in action. Will or velleity—it was certainly the first manifestation
of a really national life striving against the paralysing scaffolding
of its political organisation. The professional politicians had been
trained when politics were merely a question of technical detail, when
to be a Deputy meant merely a job as a bargainer, to get the votes
of the people for a party on the understanding that the party would
satisfy the arbitrary and personal requirements of its electors, with
the possibility of coming to power any day in one of the incredible
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account