The pedigree of fascism : $b A popular essay on the Western philosophy of politics — John Shaqi
The pedigree of fascism : $b A popular essay on the Western philosophy of politicsLion, Aline
Philosophy
The pedigree of fascism : $b A popular essay on the Western philosophy of politics
Lion, Aline
Italy -- Politics and government -- 1914-1945; Partito nazionale fascista (Italy); Political science; State, The
combinations that came to life almost daily and made the Chamber a
nursery of ministers.
On the 28th of September, 1919, the government appointed General
Badoglio Extraordinary Commissioner of the Venezia Guilia and accepted
a discussion on the matter in the Chamber. Neither the men in power
nor the opposition felt it possible to accept the suggestions of the
Press, of various associations, and even of their friends who were
urging the necessity of Fiume’s annexation. The Ministry gave in its
resignation after dissolving the House and the elections returned 157
Socialists, among whom were moderate men like Turati and Treves and
many new men whose programmes were openly revolutionary, and over a
hundred _Popolari_. These parties had a good deal in common. Their
propaganda had been nearly perfect and had appealed to the people by
that definiteness and practicalness of purpose which is the main string
to pull in order to move Italians to action. They were not dreamers
and even in their worst or best ideals they were for definiteness of
means and purpose. There is in the Italian mind such a strong tendency
to take a realistic view of things that to this characteristic the best
and the worst of their history might be traced for twenty centuries.
The Nationalists had been returned in very small number, but were
mostly young, with considerable intellectual culture, fit and ready to
assume responsibilities. They had all done active service in the war
and were sorry to see its meagre result. They required an audacious and
strong policy without being able, however, to see clearly how this was
to be realised. Liberals held a good many seats but they were so split
up that they should rather be considered as a set of groups than as a
party; they even called themselves different names and had no common
programme.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account