The Pennsylvania Journal of Prison Discipline and Philanthropy (Vol. VIII, No. II, April 1853)Philadelphia Society for Alleviating the Miseries of Public Prisons
Religion
The Pennsylvania Journal of Prison Discipline and Philanthropy (Vol. VIII, No. II, April 1853)
Philadelphia Society for Alleviating the Miseries of Public Prisons
Charities -- Periodicals; Prisons -- Periodicals
The estimates for 1852-53 for services connected with the
transportation of convicts amount to the gross sum of 101,041_l._,
which provides for the removal of 3,100 males and 800 females from
Great Britain and Ireland to Australia, and of 800 to Bermuda and
Gibraltar.
Deducting the probable expense devoted to the latter service, there
might remain about 95,000_l._, as the amount required for the
removal of 3,900 convicts, or 24_l._ per head.
From various movements in the present parliament, we are led to infer
that transportation will soon be abandoned. This event is more than
intimated in the report before us. It is inferred from the tenor of a
brief discussion of the scheme of the select committee of the House
of Commons, announced two years since, in the form of three specific
propositions, viz.:
I. That after prisoners under long sentences have undergone a
period of separate confinement, the remainder of their sentences
ought to be passed under a system of combined labor, with effectual
precautions against intercourse.
II. That this object would be greatly facilitated by the erection
of district prisons, at the national cost, for the reception of
prisoners under long sentences after they have undergone such
previous separate confinement.
III. That such district prisons should be maintained at the
national cost, and the government of such prisons, and all
appointments and salaries of officers, ought to be under the
control of Her Majesty's Government.
Col. Jebb regards these plans with unqualified favor. "If it were only
to avoid the inconvenience and expense of transportation," he says, "it
is well deserving of attention, especially in an economical point of
view."
It seems that lengthened "periods of imprisonment have not hitherto
been resorted to, partly from there being no existing prison where
sentences exceeding twelve months could be properly carried into
effect, and partly, from a sentence of transportation in former times
affording so easy a solution of all difficulty both as regarded expense
and final disposal." And Col. Jebb expresses the opinion, that "if
facilities existed for carrying into effect sentences of imprisonment
extending from eighteen months to three years without expense to the
counties and boroughs, a large proportion of the present sentences to
seven years' transportation would be changed to imprisonment." Allowing
the average sentences to be from two and a half to three years, nine
months would be past under the discipline of separation, and from
twenty-one to twenty-seven months in the district prison.
As a general conclusion of the whole matter, Col. Jebb copies and
adopts the opinion of the Parliamentary committee, that "if conducted
under proper regulations and control, separate confinement is more
efficient than any other system which has yet been tried, both in
deterring from crime and in promoting reformation."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account