The Pentateuch, in Its Progressive Revelations of God to Men — John Shaqi
The Pentateuch, in Its Progressive Revelations of God to MenCowles, Henry
Religion
The Pentateuch, in Its Progressive Revelations of God to Men
Cowles, Henry
Bible. Pentateuch -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
10. _Invariability of “kind”_ in the vegetable and animal kingdoms.
The record in Genesis sets forth that God created grass, herb, and
then fruit tree; “each after his kind;” also reptiles, fish, fowl and
land-animals, each “after his kind;” and finally man “in the image
of God.” Over against this the modern theory which bears the name of
Darwin holds that all the animals of our globe “have descended from at
most only four or five progenitors, and plants from an equal or lesser
number;”[9] and moreover, that man has in this respect no pre-eminence
above the beasts, but has descended in the same line with them from
some one of the four or five progenitors of the great animal kingdom.
More still he says in the same connection――“Analogy would lead me one
step further, viz. to the belief that _all animals and plants_ have
descended from some one prototype.”――――These four or five progenitors
of the whole animal kingdom correspond substantially with what Webster
calls the five sub-kingdoms, viz. Vertebrates, Articulates, Mollusks,
Radiates, and Protozoans. The technical classification under these
sub-kingdoms into Classes, Orders, Families, Genera, and Species
becomes of little or no account in any discussion of Darwin’s system,
for his theory of “descent with modifications” is reckless of all
these lines of demarkation, traveling over and through them all without
finding the least obstruction.――――Let it be distinctly understood
therefore that though Mr. Darwin makes frequent use of the word
“species,” and entitles one of his volumes――“_The Origin of Species_,”
yet his theory takes a far wider range than the question whether
“species are variable.” In his view not only are species variable,
intermixing at will and passing from one into another, but genera also
and families and orders and classes――not to say also each of the great
sub-kingdoms of the animal world;[10] even the distinction between
animals and vegetables fades away under his analogical argument. Hence
the issue between Darwin and Moses is relieved of whatever uncertainty
hangs over the dividing line between species and varieties, and may
fitly be limited to these two points; the invariability of “_kind_”
in the sense of Moses in Genesis; and the distinct origination of man.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account