The People's Palace and the Religious World: or, thoughts on public agitation against the promised charter to the new Crystal Palace Company, and on "Sabbath desecration" — John Shaqi
The People's Palace and the Religious World: or, thoughts on public agitation against the promised charter to the new Crystal Palace Company, and on "Sabbath desecration"Layman
Religion
The People's Palace and the Religious World: or, thoughts on public agitation against the promised charter to the new Crystal Palace Company, and on "Sabbath desecration"
Layman
Crystal Palace (Sydenham, London, England); Sunday legislation -- Great Britain
Transcribed from the [1853?] Arthur Hall, Virtue, & Co. edition by David
Price, email ccx074@pglaf.org
[Picture: Pamphlet cover]
THE
PEOPLE’S PALACE
AND THE
RELIGIOUS WORLD;
OR,
THOUGHTS ON PUBLIC AGITATION AGAINST THE PROMISED
CHARTER TO THE NEW CRYSTAL PALACE COMPANY,
AND ON “SABBATH DESECRATION.”
BY
A LAYMAN.
“THE SABBATH WAS MADE FOR MAN, NOT MAN FOR THE SABBATH.”
_Mark_ ii. 27.
* * * * *
LONDON:
PUBLISHED FOR THE AUTHOR BY
ARTHUR HALL, VIRTUE, & CO., 25, PATERNOSTER ROW,
INTRODUCTION.
DISAGREEMENT with the object and dislike of the tone of the incipient
agitation for preventing the concession of a Royal Charter to the Crystal
Palace Company, except upon the condition of its gates being closed on
Sunday—a desire to vindicate the consistency of many religious people,
whose silence might be construed into sympathy with the movement—and the
wish to offer a few thoughts on the impolicy, in a religious point of
view, of such attacks on the pleasures of the poor:—are, in brief, the
motives which have determined the printing of the following pages. The
Writer believes the ground traversed is firm and solid, though he is
unable to beguile the journey with those flowers of rhetoric and gleams
of warm fancy with which more gifted writers can brighten their course.
Though inexperience in book-making and pamphleteering is no excuse for
unsound conclusions, he hopes it may avail to disarm the severity of
criticism. Convinced that for the advantage of true religion, as well as
its professors, the ideas he has broached require to be freely, closely,
and sincerely discussed, he ventures to claim for them candid and
unprejudiced consideration. He hopes it is superfluous to state that he
has no pecuniary interest in, nor connexion with, the project in
question.
THE PEOPLE’S PALACE,
_&c._ _&c._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account