Indians of North America -- Religion; Indians of North America -- Rites and ceremonies; Peyotism
The already sufficiently intricate ethnobotanical problem of peyote has
been further complicated by an erroneous identification of a narcotic
mushroom used by the Aztecs with the cactus peyotl. Safford[1] identifies
the two by a somewhat casual use of his evidence, and mystifies himself
with the consistent contradiction offered by all the early Spanish
writers to his assumption. He composes the contradiction by assuming
that the Aztecs did not recognize the dried discoidal button as the same
plant as the green cactus; despite overwhelming etymological evidence he
supposes they called the former teo-nanacatl and the latter peyotl. Only
a complete review of the evidence can clear up this misapprehension.
The Spanish writers consistently describe the two separately,
with detailed circumstantial distinctions which leave no room for
misunderstanding. Sahagún,[2] says
[The Chichimeca] had a great knowledge of herbs and roots
and knew their qualities and their virtues. They themselves
discovered and first used the root that they call peiotl and
those that used to gather and eat them used them in place of
wine, and they did the same with those that they call nanacatl,
which are toadstools [hongos malos] that also make one drunk
like wine.
Again, in a special chapter on intoxicating plants, Sahagún distinguishes
the two:
There is another herb like tunas of the earth [the Spanish name
for the fruit of the prickly pear, _Opuntia opuntia_] which
is called peiotl. It is white. It grows in the northern part.
Those that eat it see frightening and laughable visions. This
intoxication lasts two or three days and then stops....[3]
There are some little mushrooms in their land that they call
teo-nanacatl. They grow under the grass of the fields or
pastures. They are round. They have a sort of high stem [pie],
thin and round. They are eaten with great relish, but they harm
the throat and make one drunk.[4]
Still further to emphasize the point, Sahagún in the next section of
this chapter[5] goes on to speak of edible mushrooms:
The cone-shaped mushrooms (mushrooms or nanacatl) _genus campos
agrorum_ in the mountains are good to eat. They are cooked
because of this, and if they are raw or badly cooked, they
produce vomiting or diarrhea, and they kill one,
and he continues to list and describe a number of other edibles.
The naturalist Hernandez[6] is even more explicit. He describes
teo-nanacatl under the heading “De nanacatl seu Fungorum genere”; and
from the harmless white mushrooms, iztacnanacame, the red mushrooms,
tlapalnanacame, and the yellow-orbicular mushrooms, chimalnanacame, he
distinguishes teo-nanacatl as “teyhuinti,” that is, “intoxicating.”
Siméon’s Nahuatl dictionary even uses nanacatl as an illustration:[7]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account