The Philippine Islands, 1493-1898; Volume 50: Explorations by early navigators, descriptions of the islands and their peoples, their history and records of the catholic missions, as related in contemporaneous books and manuscripts, showing the political, economic, commercial and religious conditions of those islands from their earliest relations with European nations to the close of the nineteenth century
History
The Philippine Islands, 1493-1898; Volume 50: Explorations by early navigators, descriptions of the islands and their peoples, their history and records of the catholic missions, as related in contemporaneous books and manuscripts, showing the political, economic, commercial and religious conditions of those islands from their earliest relations with European nations to the close of the nineteenth century
Demarcation line of Alexander VI; Missions -- Philippines; Philippines -- Discovery and exploration; Philippines -- History -- Sources
It is an abuse, born of the preceding, that the archbishop of Manila
and the three bishops of Nueva Cáceres, Nueva Segovia, and Cebú,
residing in their dioceses, may be bishops in partibus, since,
under pretext of the exemption of the regulars, they may not ask
the latter how they administer their obventions or how they live,
which in truth is the height of scandal.
Remedy for this evil
The venerable Palafox, in La Puebla, conquered the regulars by a
formal judgment that as parish priests they must remain subject to
the ordinary; but after his removal to Osma those who were expelled
succeeded in nullifying this and other just decisions. The same
thing was obtained in Manila by Archbishop Camacho; but after he was
transferred to the bishopric of Guadalajara in Nueva España the same
thing happened as in La Puebla, so that the regulars have continued
and still remain in the same abuse--which will cease by ordering
them to obey the judgment secured by Camacho (or by the council,
which is the same thing). [82]
SEVENTH ABUSE
Just as the bishops who live within their dioceses are bishops in
partibus, the king is that in the Filipinas Islands. His Majesty
resides in them by the authority communicated to his president and
Audiencia, and to the alcaldes, governors, and corregidors of the
provinces, in which the president, Audiencia, and other ministers do
not command, but only the religious father.
The king is named as such, and is called upon as king, only in order
that he may pay the stipends; beyond that his royal name is abhorred
and persecuted.
It causes horror to see a religious, paid and maintained by his
Majesty, with the character of apostolic missionary, no sooner
arrived at Manila from these kingdoms than he immediately publishes
and defends the assertion that the king is not master of the islands,
but only they who have conquered them; that the Indian ought not to
pay tribute; and that no bull [i.e., of the Crusade] is needed. It is
for this very reason that there are so many difficulties in collecting
the tribute, and that the bull is not purchased excepting in Manila
and its environs.
With these opinions, and their extolling, some the pontifical grants
to their girdle, others those of the scapulary of Carmel, [83] and
others their exercises, they obtain vast contributions which they
call alms; and the king is left with the bulls, for the religious
assert and proclaim that they are not necessary.
In regard to jurisdiction, it is a well-known fact that no
gobernadorcillo of Indians carries out any mandate of the president,
Audiencia, or alcalde without the permission of the religious
father--under penalty of one hundred lashes, which are given to him
instantly if he obeys the royal magistrates and justices.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account