The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elementsProclus
Philosophy
The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elements
Proclus
Euclid. Elements; Platonists
to one another, it is necessary they should be right. Besides, the
word _successive_ appears to me not to be added superfluously, as
some have improperly considered it; since it exhibits the reason of
rectitude. For it is on this account that each of the angles is right;
because, when they are _successive_, they are equal. And, indeed,
the insisting right-line, on account of its inflexibility to either
part, is the cause of equality to both, and of rectitude to each.
The cause, therefore, of the rectitude of angles, is not absolutely
mutual equality, but position in a consequent order, together with
equality. But, besides all this, I think it here necessary to call to
mind, the purpose of our author; I mean, that he discourses in this
place, concerning the angles consisting in one plane. And hence, this
definition is not of every perpendicular; but of that which is in one
and the same plane. For it is not his present design to define a solid
angle. As, therefore, he defines, in this place, a plane angle, so
likewise a perpendicular of this kind. Because a solid perpendicular
ought not to make right angles to one right-line only; but to all which
touch it, and are contained in its subject plane: for this is its
necessary peculiarity.
DEFINITION XIII.
A BOUND is that which is the Extremity of any thing[160].
A Bound, in this place, is not to be referred to all magnitudes, for
there is a bound and extremity of a line; but to the spaces which are
contained in superficies, and to solid bodies. For he now calls a
bound, the ambit which terminates and distinguishes every space. And
a bound of this kind, he defines to be an extremity: but not after
the manner in which a point is called the extremity of a line, but
according to its property of including and excluding from circumjacent
figures. But this name is proper to geometry in its infant state, by
which they measured fields, and preserved their boundaries distinct and
without confusion, and from which they arrived at the knowledge of the
present science. Since, therefore, Euclid calls the external ambit,
a bound, it is not without propriety that he, by this means, defines
the extremity of spaces. For by this, every thing comprehended is
circumscribed. I say, for example, in a circle, its bound and extremity
is the circumference; but itself, a certain plane space: and so of the
rest.
DEFINITION XIV.
A FIGURE is that which is comprehended by one or more
Boundaries.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account