Motion, whether it be that of our own body in controlled muscular
activity, or that imaginary motion of the environment which we
call giddiness, or a sensibly perceived motion of some part of the
environment, that is, a motion which we can compensate by some actual
or imaginary change in the position of our own body produced by our
own exertion, is an intuitively felt change, and is incapable of
intellectual representation. It is not clearly conceived either in
ancient or in modern geometry. Euclidean geometry is, as we have
seen, based directly on our intuition of bodily exertion, but it is
essentially static in treatment. Let it be admitted that we can draw a
straight line of any length and in any direction, and so on; then we
regard these straight lines, etc., as motionless, abstract things, and
we proceed to discuss their relationships. Cartesian geometry, and the
methods of the infinitesimal calculus, do not treat of real motion, and
the concept, if it is introduced at all, is introduced illegitimately
and surreptitiously. Consider what we do when we “plot a curve.” Let
the latter be a parabola having the equation _y_ = 1/2 _x_. Now a
parabola is defined as “the locus of a point which _moves_, so that its
distance from a fixed point is in a constant relation to its distance
from a fixed straight line.” How do we construct such a curve?
[Illustration: FIG. 5.]
We proceed to fix the positions of a series of points in this way:
there are two straight lines, _OX_ and _OY_, at right angles to each
other, and we measure off certain steps along the line _OX_; these
steps are _OX_↓{0·5}, _OX_↓{1}, _OX_↓{1·5}, _OX_↓{2}, and so on, the
small numerals indicating the distance of each point (_OX_↓{0·5}, etc.)
from the origin _O_. We then draw lines perpendicular to the _X_-axis
through these points. We have now to calculate one-half of the square
of each of these lengths _OX_↓{0·5}, _OX_↓{1}, etc., and then we mark
off these calculated lengths along the perpendicular lines. The point
_A_, for instance, is 1/2(0·5)^2 from the point _X_↓{0·5}, _B_ is
1/2(1)^2 from _X_↓{1}, and so on. In this way we obtain a series of
points, _A_, _B_, _C_, _D_, _E_, etc., and these are points on the
locus of the “moving” point.
[Illustration: FIG. 6.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account