Suppose that the energy of the engine is employed to drive a dynamo.
The armature of the latter rotates against the constraint of powerful
electro-magnets, and in so doing a current of electricity is generated.
By the law of conservation this current should contain as much energy
as was put into the rotation of the armature; as a matter of fact it
does not, and the deficiency is represented by the friction of the
parts of the machine against each other, by imperfect conductivity of
electricity in the wires, and by imperfect insulation of the current.
Friction, imperfect conductivity, and imperfect insulation all
transform to heat, and this radiates away. Suppose now that the current
is used for lighting purposes: to do this it must heat the metallic
filaments in the lamps, or the points of the carbons in an arc. This
heat then transforms to light, but along with the light, which was the
object of the transformation, heat is produced, and this heat radiates
away.
The actual process in which the particular form of energy required is
generated may or may not be reversible in theory. That employed in
the steam-engine is not, for if we start with a cold boiler and then
work the engine backwards we could not raise steam. The process in the
dynamo is theoretically reversible: if we send a current of electricity
into a dynamo the machine will begin to rotate, and become a motor, so
that we can obtain mechanical work from it. Now in theory all forms of
energy are mutually convertible, and all can be expressed in terms of
a common unit. The unit of mechanical energy is called the _erg_: let
a current, the energy of which is equal to _N_ ergs, be sent into the
dynamo, then we ought to obtain from the latter mechanical energy equal
to _N_ ergs. Conversely, if _N_ ergs of mechanical energy be employed
to rotate the dynamo, we should obtain electrical energy equal to this
amount. Now as a matter of fact we do not obtain these theoretical
conversions, for some of the electrical energy is dissipated when we
employ the machine as a motor, and some of the mechanical energy is
likewise dissipated when we employ it as a dynamo.
The entity that we call energy is the product of two factors, a
capacity-factor and an intensity-factor. Thus:--
Mechanical energy = quantity of water × height at which it is
of water power situated above the water-motor.
Energy of an = quantity of electricity × electrical potential.
electric current
Chemical energy = equivalent weight of the substance ×
chemical potential.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account