The philosophy of Jake Haiden (late Jacob K. Huff) : $b selected from the columns of the Reading Times, Reading, Pennsylvania : with a biographical appreciation by his friend Henry W. ShoemakerHuff, Jacob K.
Philosophy
The philosophy of Jake Haiden (late Jacob K. Huff) : $b selected from the columns of the Reading Times, Reading, Pennsylvania : with a biographical appreciation by his friend Henry W. Shoemaker
Huff, Jacob K.
American essays; Huff, Jacob K., 1851-1910
In pioneer days in this country, when it was desirable to have many
children born to the new soil, and thus populate the wild country with
people who knew of no other land, and would more likely live contented in
the American wilderness than in the over-populated, lord-laden countries
beyond the seas, the big family was a safeguard against the encroachments
of the Indian and was desirable.
So, too, when Mormonism was a weak doctrine, and grown men would not
accept it as a religion, the pioneers of that faith removed to Utah
and built a city on the parched desert by the inland sea known as Salt
Lake. From here they sent out missionaries to foreign countries, making
converts among the women and families that were prolific in bearing
children. It shows the wisdom of Brigham Young.
He preached to the women that every child born to them added a new star
to their crown of glory. Those who believed the doctrine were anxious to
add to the population of Utah and add a few stars to their future crown.
This is one reason why the unmarried women accepted polygamy. The one
great desire, fired by religious enthusiasm, was to bear children who
would fight for the new doctrine.
It was a matter of wisdom on one side and sheer deception on the other.
It was cheaper to rear Mormon recruits than to secure them full grown.
And the child Mormon would never renounce the faith imbibed at the
mother’s knee.
And thus you will find the situation in all cases where the race was made
to believe that God loved the prolific woman better than the barren maid.
Women will submit to anything, if made to believe it is their religious
duty to do so. But men now realize that there is a psychological problem
connected with the rearing of children, and the question is asked: Is
it the wisest thing to bring into the world many children who cannot
obtain a practical education, and therefore over-populate the nation with
ignorant and dependent creatures? Do we not need quality rather than
quantity?
Is Germany any better off with its prolific families than France with
reduced numbers? Or take your own village or town—who is the best
prepared for the battles of life, the child belonging to a family of
fifteen members, or the child who is one of three or four offsprings?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account