The Philosophy Which Shows the Physiology of Mesmerism and Explains the Phenomenon of ClairvoyancePasley, T. H.
Philosophy
The Philosophy Which Shows the Physiology of Mesmerism and Explains the Phenomenon of Clairvoyance
Pasley, T. H.
Mesmerism
Modern philosophy adopts different kinds of heat,--_animal, culinary,
and latent heat_. The first is our own feeling excited by means of
fire in the sensitive centre, the brain; also by exercise and disease,
in the absence of fire. How is the spark from the flint or from the
steel to saturate a bushel of coal with heat? How, again, does "heat
come to an equilibrium in all surrounding bodies," when some portion
of the coal may be black cold, and others red hot--using the popular
terms--in the fire-place, at the same time, and while the air in the
chamber is indexing zero? _Latent heat_ is of the philosopher's own
peculiar making; and on the "_great discovery_" the most unbounded
praise is still bestowed. Latent heat, "which all bodies possess
without being heated," which, "heats nothing," and is not hot, is
cold heat, and should be nomenclatured such, or, absurd heat. Are not
Instructors less than half-reasoners and unnatural philosophers, who
abide by and teach such consummate nonsense: on a par with which is
the discovery of "latent dark light"--"of black being formed by the
intermixture of two luminous rays at the point of intersection in
the spectrum," which is the same as feelable darkness; after which,
there only remains for "_new discovery_," latent sound, for inking
on, thence vibrating from, a sheet of music-paper; and latent motion,
to keep a stone at rest, the quantity of motion in the world having
been already ascertained arithmetically to a fraction; the last-day
discovery, the quantity of right reason, is the small remaining trifle
to be discovered. Radiation of heat and cold by fire and ice, being
inconsistent with the _inertia_ of _matter_, is an erroneous and
greatly-misleading assumption, although proved through the nicest
experiments, according to the experimenter's ideas.
Instead of fire communicating anything to bodies, _fire promotes loss
to everything_ in its neighbourhood. The bars of stoves, iron pokers,
steam-boilers; all culinary vessels; coal, wood, candles, paper, linen,
all suffer loss by means of fire; cinders, charcoal, tinder, are but
remains: to which it is no exception that some bodies acquire substance
and weight in becoming oxydes; because, previous to acquiring oxygen
from the air, they must have lost elementary matter to the fire to make
spaces for the oxygen to enter, otherwise the open air should oxydize
equally, in the absence of fire.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account