The Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537, and the Exeter Conspiracy, 1538, Volume 2 (of 2)Dodds, Madeleine Hope
History
The Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537, and the Exeter Conspiracy, 1538, Volume 2 (of 2)
Dodds, Madeleine Hope
Exeter, Henry Courtenay, Marquis of, 1496?-1538; Great Britain -- History -- Henry VIII, 1509-1547; Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537
In all this conference it is evident that the greatest importance
attached to Norfolk’s representation of the King’s attitude. If he had
spoken the strict truth, he would have said that Henry was very angry,
that the few concessions which he had made had been forced from him by
sheer necessity, that he was absolutely determined not to yield an inch
more, that in particular he would not give up the monasteries or the
supremacy, and that he was extremely anxious to punish the leaders of
the rising. There is no reason to believe that Norfolk was so tactless
as to reveal any of this. He probably encouraged the Pilgrims’ idea that
Henry had been so far misled by Cromwell and that witch Anne Boleyn that
he did not realise what he had been doing. The Pilgrimage had opened his
eyes, and for this he was grateful. But it would be undignified in him
to grant petitions which were backed by force. Only let the Pilgrims
submit and disperse, and the King, now restored to his right mind, would
do all they desired, if they would proceed by entreaty and
constitutional means. As the Pilgrims regarded Norfolk as almost one of
themselves, his words would have all the more weight. But on the one
point they were still unpersuadable; the monasteries must be allowed to
stand. Norfolk knew perfectly well that the King would never agree to
this, but he had received a significant hint from his master as to how
he should act in these circumstances. In his letter of 2 December Henry
had reminded him: “you said you would esteem no promise you should make
to the rebels nor think your honour touched in the breach of it.”[68]
The implication is clear:—“Why do you trouble me about making
concessions to the rebels? Promise anything they demand for yourself,
but leave me free to repudiate it afterwards.” Finding that there was no
other way of dealing with the problem of the monasteries, Norfolk and
the Pilgrims finally agreed upon a compromise. The abbots must surrender
their houses to the King’s commissioners, but they should then be
restored by the King’s authority until the next parliament, which was to
settle their fate[69]. At the end of the day Aske and his companions
returned to the rest of the three hundred at the Grey Friars with these
terms: a free pardon, the promise of a free parliament, and the
provisional restoration of the abbeys. After laying the proposed treaty
before them, Aske, at Norfolk’s request, rode back to Pontefract the
same night to communicate the terms to the assembly there[70].
Meanwhile Norfolk and the rest of his council wrote to the King, stating
the terms they had made, and honestly declaring that they did not
believe there would be any possibility of peace unless the King would
give up the abbeys, at any rate temporarily[71].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account