The Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537, and the Exeter Conspiracy, 1538, Volume 2 (of 2)Dodds, Madeleine Hope
History
The Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537, and the Exeter Conspiracy, 1538, Volume 2 (of 2)
Dodds, Madeleine Hope
Exeter, Henry Courtenay, Marquis of, 1496?-1538; Great Britain -- History -- Henry VIII, 1509-1547; Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537
=151= On 22 February 1536–7 it was reported in Norfolk that seven of
the Lincolnshire rebels had been executed by the Duke of
Suffolk’s orders. (L. and P. XII (1), 424; printed in full,
Furnivall, “Ballads from MSS,” vol. I, pt 2, p. 311 [Ballad
Society].)
=176= For another political play which probably dealt with the
Pilgrimage of Grace, see “The Date of Albion, Knight,” by M.
H. Dodds in “The Library,” April 1913.
=189= Cromwell’s name is used rather loosely throughout the passages
relating to the evidence. As he was the moving spirit in the
prosecution he is described as making all the notes and
drawing all the conclusions found among the documents relating
to the trials.
=217= Delete Lord Cobham’s name, as no expression of his opinions is
recorded in the preceding pages.
=219= Sir Ingram Percy’s will is printed in “North Country Wills”
(Surtees Society), I, 156.
CHAPTER XV
THE SECOND APPOINTMENT AT DONCASTER
The position and objects of the rebels having been set forth, it is now
time to consider the situation from the King’s point of view.
The Pilgrims had stated their grievances definitely, and begged the King
to tell them what redress he was prepared to give. In order to discover
what answer he would make, it is necessary to go back to the mission of
Bowes and Ellerker at the beginning of November. On their first arrival
Henry had himself drawn up a reply to the five articles[1], very much on
the lines of his reply to Lincolnshire[2], but on the whole milder in
tone. The King condescended almost to argument, as for instance in the
recital of the names of his Privy Council, now full of noblemen, whereas
at the beginning of his reign there had been but two nobles of the old
blood, “others, as the Lords Marney and Darcy, scant well-born
gentlemen.” Also he demanded the surrender of only ten ringleaders,
instead of a hundred, as in Lincolnshire[3]. It is not necessary to go
into the details of the reply, however, for in essence it was simply a
refusal to listen to any of the rebels’ remonstrances, and it had no
external result because it was never sent.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account