The Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537, and the Exeter Conspiracy, 1538, Volume 2 (of 2)Dodds, Madeleine Hope
History
The Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537, and the Exeter Conspiracy, 1538, Volume 2 (of 2)
Dodds, Madeleine Hope
Exeter, Henry Courtenay, Marquis of, 1496?-1538; Great Britain -- History -- Henry VIII, 1509-1547; Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537
When he wrote it Henry seems to have been under the impression that the
Pilgrims were already scattered, and that the affair would be over
almost as quickly as the Lincolnshire rising. By the time the reply was
received the rebels might be expected to be in a properly submissive
frame of mind. As he gradually became convinced that the truce was
merely a truce, and not a capitulation, the dreadful suspicion may have
dawned in his mind that these traitors might not accept his gracious
answer, written with his own hand, in the proper spirit. They might
hesitate, argue, even reject it. The very idea of such a humiliation was
too terrible to be entertained. The King would not run such a risk.
Instead of issuing his reply to the Yorkshiremen, he caused his reply to
Lincolnshire to be printed, thus returning an indirect answer to the
rebels, without exposing himself. But his labour was not wasted, for he
let it be known among the Pilgrims that he had answered their petition,
but that he would not as yet allow them to see his reply. His letter to
Ellerker and Bowes supplied this omission to some extent, and once the
Pilgrims had made a full list of their grievances, as a substitute for
their first general petition, the King’s answer became quite
insufficient. The stages by which Henry was reluctantly forced to
acknowledge that he was obliged to treat formally with the Pilgrims have
already been traced. On 14 November he had resolved to send Norfolk and
Fitzwilliam to negotiate with them[4], and the first set of instructions
was drawn up for their direction. They were to be provided with a
safe-conduct under the Great Seal, “a proclamation implying a pardon,”
and the King’s original answer. On their arrival at Doncaster they were
permitted to arrange an interview with Darcy and three hundred others.
They were to induce this company to come to them merely on their own
promise of safety if possible, but if they could not be persuaded that
this was sufficient security they might be given the safe-conduct. On
this point of the safe-conduct the King was extremely sensitive. He
seems to have felt that to grant one was a kind of recognition of
belligerency; also it hurt his pride to acknowledge that any of his
subjects were not wholly at his mercy. Apart from this we perhaps may
see here one of the extraordinary freaks of his conscience. He would
have had no hesitation in ordering Suffolk to seize the Pilgrims who had
come to negotiate with Norfolk on the security of Norfolk’s word, but he
would prefer not to violate his own safe-conduct. Except for this matter
there is not much of importance in these first instructions to Norfolk.
Henry was not going to give way on any point. Darcy and his company must
be persuaded and exhorted by the Duke to submit themselves entirely to
the King, to make no further question concerning their petitions, and to
accept the pardon which the King was willing to extend to all but a few
persons specially named.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account