The Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537, and the Exeter Conspiracy, 1538, Volume 2 (of 2)Dodds, Madeleine Hope
History
The Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537, and the Exeter Conspiracy, 1538, Volume 2 (of 2)
Dodds, Madeleine Hope
Exeter, Henry Courtenay, Marquis of, 1496?-1538; Great Britain -- History -- Henry VIII, 1509-1547; Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537
In the fourth place there is the evidence of William Collins.
Clarencieux King-of-Arms arrived at Kendal on 22 December, bringing the
King’s pardon. The farmers of the priory of Cartmell and the restored
monks were quarrelling over the rents and corn, and when they heard of
the herald’s arrival two of the monks came to him and begged him to
write an order for them. The herald would not write himself, but he
directed Collins to write, which he did, in the herald’s presence, to
the following effect: “Neighbours of Cartmell, so it is that the King’s
herald hath made proclamation here that every man, pain of high treason,
should suffer everything, as farms, tithes, and such other, to be in
like stay and order concerning possessions as they were in time of the
last meeting at Doncaster, except ye will of your charity help the
brethren there somewhat towards their boards, till my lord of Norfolk
come again and take further order therein.”[94] All the monasteries of
the north had been restored before the last conference at Doncaster, and
putting together Dakyn’s and Collins’ statements it appears that the
monks were to be left unmolested, but that the rents, etc., were to
remain in the hands of the farmers and grantees of the monasteries, who
should, however, make an allowance to the monks.
Finally it appears that as soon as he returned home Sir Thomas Hilton,
who, like Bowes, had been prominent at Doncaster, insisted on restoring
the Friars Observant of Newcastle[95].
From the evidence of all these persons, the majority of them being men
who had every opportunity of knowing the truth, it seems certain that
Norfolk promised at Doncaster that the monasteries should be allowed to
stand, subject to an agreement with the farmers of them, until the
promised parliament met.
Norfolk had no authority for making any such promise, and in the absence
of any proof of his actual words, it is not fair to accuse him of
treachery. It is not likely that he pretended to have the power which he
did not possess. In all probability he only promised to make suit to the
King that the monasteries should stand, although he may have held out
strong hopes that the King would grant his suit, while he knew very well
that the King would do nothing of the sort.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account