The Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537, and the Exeter Conspiracy, 1538, Volume 2 (of 2) — John Shaqi
The Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537, and the Exeter Conspiracy, 1538, Volume 2 (of 2)Dodds, Madeleine Hope
History
The Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537, and the Exeter Conspiracy, 1538, Volume 2 (of 2)
Dodds, Madeleine Hope
Exeter, Henry Courtenay, Marquis of, 1496?-1538; Great Britain -- History -- Henry VIII, 1509-1547; Pilgrimage of Grace, 1536-1537
If the rebels would conform themselves
absolutely and surrender the aforesaid ringleaders they might be
permitted to receive the King’s answer “in a much more certain sort than
the articles were proponed so that all indifferent men must be
content.”[5] If they would submit, Norfolk was to administer to them the
oath of the Lincolnshire men; if they refused he was to gain as much
time as possible by discussion, and at the first favourable opportunity
he must break off the negotiations and straightway attack the rebels[6].
With these instructions Norfolk and Fitzwilliam set out. On 27 November
the King wrote to them at Leicester. The rebels’ attitude was still very
threatening, and he seems to have thought that there was little prospect
of peace, but he was still determined not to yield a single point; he
would not give hostages for Aske; he would not grant fourteen days’
truce for the appointment, “our instructions treat of a time to be won
by policy, and not of an abstinence by pact, which would give them time
to fortify themselves.”[7]
These letters and instructions must have been very painful reading for
Norfolk and the Admiral. It was abundantly evident by this time that
there was no chance of winning over Darcy, and as far as could be
discovered the other leaders were equally unapproachable. For a short
while the royalists entertained some hope of winning over Aske, owing to
the report of a spy. This man was called Knight, and was a servant of
Sir Francis Brian[8]. Knight went into the rebels’ country about 14
November[9], to learn what he could about their strength. When he was in
York, his appearance aroused suspicion, but he escaped by saying that he
was a servant of Sir Peter Vavasour. On 15 November, however, he was
recognised as Brian’s servant and taken before Aske. With great presence
of mind and some humour Knight told the captain that Sir Francis had
sent him in pursuit of his chaplain who was a thief[10]. Aske sent
Knight back to his master with a letter to request a description of the
missing chaplain, as he was determined not to protect bad
characters[11]. It was Knight who told Sir Francis that Aske had only
one eye. He had returned to his master by 18 November[12]. Apparently
Knight had had some communication with Sir Peter Vavasour, whose name he
had used as a protection, although Sir Peter was with the Pilgrims[13].
Knight told Sir Francis Brian that, according to Sir Peter, Aske had
been heard to say that some men who were not suspected were worse than
he, and that he would gladly accept the King’s pardon. Brian repeated
this to Sir Anthony Browne, who sent the report on to Norfolk and
Fitzwilliam. The King’s deputies reached Nottingham on Wednesday 29
November, and there they wrote to Sir Peter Vavasour[14]. They stated
that it had been represented to them that Aske was wavering. If he
would, he could do more service than a greater man, and Sir Peter must
urge him to throw himself on the King’s mercy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account