Assuming, then, that the plums known in pomology as Domestica plums
belong to one species, the original habitat of the species may be
sought. In spite of the great number of varieties of plums now grown in
Europe and western Asia, and the importance of the fruit both in the
green and dried state, the history of the plums cannot be traced with
much certainty beyond two thousand years. Though stones, without doubt
those of the Insititia or Damson and the Spinosa or Blackthorn plums,
are found in the remains of the lake dwellings in central Europe[7]
the pits of Domestica plums have not yet come to light. In the summer
of 1909 the writer, in visiting historic Pompeii, became interested in
the illustrations of fruits in the frescoes of the ancient buildings,
but neither in the houses of the ruined city nor in the frescoes in the
museums in Naples could he find plums, though several other fruits,
as apples, pears, figs and grapes were many times illustrated. An
examination of the remains of plants preserved in the museum at Naples
taken from under the ashes and pumice covering Pompeii gave the same
results. No stone-fruits were to be found, though if widely used these
should have been on sale in the markets of Pompeii at the time of the
destruction of the city, which occurred late in August,—the very time of
the year at which the examination was made and at which time plums were
everywhere for sale in Rome. This observation is but another indication
that plums were not well-known before the beginning of Christianity,
since Pompeii was destroyed in 79 A. D. In Greek literature the
references to plums are few before the Christian era and these are more
likely to some form of Insititia, as the Damsons, rather than to the
Domesticas.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account