The plurality of the human racePouchet, G. (Georges)
Philosophy
The plurality of the human race
Pouchet, G. (Georges)
Monogenism and polygenism
[29] “If I am not mistaken,” says M. de Quatrefages, “there is in this
result, independently of the scientific consequences which may proceed
from it, a something which responds to our most noble aspirations.
Man confers upon himself dominion _of his own will_; he loves to
proclaim himself legitimate sovereign of all things on the surface
of this globe; and, in fact, no creature will dare to dispute with
him an empire which, day by day, extends and increases. Well! is it
not satisfactory to behold _anthropological characteristics_ sanction
and ennoble this empire by placing by the side of the _right_, which
springs from intellectual superiority, the notion of _duty_, which
arises from morality and religion?” (_Unité de l’Espèce Humaine_, p.
33.)
[30] Courtet de l’Isle has already made this remark. (_Tableau
Ethnographique du Genre Humain_, 1849, p. 8.)
[31] See the _Voyage de l’Isabelle_; also Desmoulins, _Histoire
Naturelle des Races Humaines_, 1826, p. 276.
[32] Cirripeds, tortoises, ornithodelphi, and generally speaking, the
extreme representatives of the divisions of each natural classification.
[33] _Mémoire sur les Tasmaniens, sur les Alfourous, et sur les
Australiens_, in the _Annales des Sciences Naturelles_, 1827, vol. x,
p. 155.
[34] Hale, _Natives of Australia_, etc. See _American Journal of
Science_, second series, vol. i, p. 302, May 1846; extract from the
account of C. Wilkes’ Expedition: _Narrative of the U. S. Exploring
Expedition during the years 1838-1842_, vol. vi, “Ethnography and
Philology.”
[35] _Voyage de l’Astrolabe: Zoologie_, vol. i, p. 43.
[36] Even after the assertions of M. de Quatrefages in the _Unité des
Races Humaines_, p. 162, and following, we have not thought ourselves
justified in changing our opinions on the subject of the Australians,
which have lately been confirmed at the Anthropological Society; a Mr.
O’Rourke, an eyewitness, having answered M. de Quatrefages (_Bulletins
de la Société d’Anthropologie_, 21 June, 1860).
[37] J. Ross, _Narrative of a Second Voyage_, etc., 1835, p. 448.
[38] J. Ross, _Narrative of a Second Voyage_, p. 490.
[39] See Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, _Comptes Rendus_, vol. v,
p. 42. [We should very much like to know at what period our author
imagines this to have been the case, and whether he considers that
these apes were the “men of the day.”--EDITOR.]
[40] “Memorandum on an Unknown Forest Race,” etc., _Journal of the
Asiatic Society of Bengal_, 1855, vol. xxiv, p. 207.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account