The Pneumatic Despatch Tube System of the Batcheller Pneumatic Tube Co.: Also, Facts and General Information Relating to Pneumatic Despatch TubesBatcheller, Birney C. (Birney Clark)
History
The Pneumatic Despatch Tube System of the Batcheller Pneumatic Tube Co.: Also, Facts and General Information Relating to Pneumatic Despatch Tubes
Batcheller, Birney C. (Birney Clark)
Pneumatic-tube transportation
It was such a result that the
patents of Clay and Lieb aimed to accomplish.
In order to demonstrate the practicability of the system, the
Electro-Pneumatic Transit Company had constructed in the basement of
the Mills Building, on Broad Street, New York, a short line of small
brass tubing, about two or three inches in diameter, with one branch,
thus connecting three stations together. The tube was very short,
probably not more than two hundred feet in length. The air-pressure
required was very slight, probably not more than an ounce or two, being
supplied by a small blower run by an electric motor.
At the junction of the branch and the main tube was located a switch
that could be moved across the main tube and so deflect the approaching
carrier into the branch. This switch was moved by an electro-magnet,
or solenoid, that could be excited by pressing a button at the station
from which the carrier was sent. When the carrier passed into the
branch tube it set the switch back into its normal position, so that a
second carrier, following the first, would pass along the main tube,
unless the switch was again moved by pressing the button at the sending
station.
This tube in the Mills Building worked well, but it was of a size
only suited to the transmission of cash in a store or other similar
service. It could not be said, because this tube worked well, that
a larger and longer tube with numerous branches would work equally
well. In fact, there are several reasons why such a tube would not
operate satisfactorily. The method of operating the switches was
impracticable. Suppose the branch tube had been located two miles away
from the sending station and that it would take a carrier four minutes
to travel from the sending station to the junction of the branch tube.
Again, suppose that we have just despatched a carrier destined for a
station on the main line beyond the junction, and that we wish to
despatch the second carrier to be switched off into the branch tube,
we must wait at least four minutes, until the first carrier has passed
the junction, before we can press the button and set the switch for
the second carrier which may be on its way. How are we to know when
the first carrier has passed the junction, and when the second will
arrive there, in order that we may throw the switch at the proper time?
Must we hold our watch and time each carrier? It is plain that this is
not practical. I take this as an illustration of the impracticability
of the Clay-Lieb System as constructed in the Mills Building when
extended to practical dimensions. I will not describe the mechanism and
details of the system, which are ingenious, but will say in passing
that the automatic sluice-gates, which work very well in a three-inch
tube with carriers weighing an ounce or two and air-pressures of only
a few ounces per square inch, would be useless and could not be made
to operate in a six-inch tube with carriers weighing from eight to
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account