The Pocket Gophers (Genus Thomomys) of Utah: University of Kansas Publications, Museum of Natural History, Vol. 1 No. 1Durrant, Stephen David
Science
The Pocket Gophers (Genus Thomomys) of Utah: University of Kansas Publications, Museum of Natural History, Vol. 1 No. 1
Durrant, Stephen David
Pocket gophers -- Utah
_Diagnosis._--Size medium (see measurements). Color: Upper parts
Dresden Brown, grading over sides to Pale Buff on underparts; chin
white; ears small, pointed, with deeply pigmented pinnae; postauricular
patches grayish black; nose dusky. Skull: Long and narrow; nasals long,
rounded proximally and usually simple distally; rostrum long;
interparietal triangular; tympanic bullae large, and well inflated
ventrally; basioccipital narrow; palate narrow; palatal pits shallow;
dentition light.
_Comparisons._--Near topotypes of _fossor_ can be distinguished from
topotypes of _Thomomys talpoides ocius_ as follows: Size larger
throughout. Color: Darker throughout, being dark brown as opposed to
grayish. Skull: Longer and narrower; nasals and rostrum longer;
extension of supraoccipital posterior to lambdoidal suture markedly
less; tympanic bullae markedly smaller; upper incisors longer and not
as strongly recurved.
Among the races of _Thomomys talpoides_ occurring in Utah, _fossor_
most closely resembles _Thomomys talpoides uinta_ in color and size,
but differs from it as follows: Ears smaller, more pointed and with
more darkly pigmented pinnae. Skull: Longer, narrower and weaker;
rostrum longer; nasals longer, and rounded proximally as opposed to
markedly emarginate; interparietal triangular instead of roughly
pentagonal; tympanic bullae larger and more inflated ventrally;
basioccipital narrower; palate narrower, palatal pits shallower;
dentition lighter.
_Remarks._--Bailey (1915:111) remarked that _fossor_ was one form that
held its distinctive characters over a wide range. At that time, its
range was understood to include practically all of the mountainous
parts of Colorado, Utah as far west as the central part of the state,
and parts of New Mexico, Arizona and Wyoming. Subsequently three new
forms have been named from central Utah, (Goldman 1938:334-337) thereby
showing variation to be much more prevalent than formerly supposed.
The range of _fossor_ in Utah, as now understood, is limited to the
mountainous parts of the state south and east of the Colorado and Green
rivers in Grand and San Juan counties.
The Utah specimens are not typical. At first glance some differences
are noted in the premaxillae and nasals. Four specimens in the
collections of the Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas,
three from 3 miles east of Creede, Mineral County, and one from 10
miles east of Lake City, Hinsdale County, Colorado, both of which lie
north and east of the type locality of _fossor_ show the same
characters as the Utah specimens.
Eight specimens from Oak Spring are intergrades between _fossor_ and
_ocius_. In size and color they are like _fossor_, but the skulls are
intermediate. Because the animals are more like _fossor_ in the
majority of characters, they are here referred to that race.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account