The Political Doctrines of Sun Yat-sen: An Exposition of the San Min Chu ILinebarger, Paul Myron Anthony
History
The Political Doctrines of Sun Yat-sen: An Exposition of the San Min Chu I
Linebarger, Paul Myron Anthony
Sun, Yat-sen, 1866-1925. San min zhu yi
119 d’Elia translation, cited, p. 266, note 1. Father d’Elia discusses
the reasons which made it seem more probable that Sun was
transliterating the name Millar into Chinese rather than (John
Stuart) Mill.
120 d’Elia translation, cited, p. 256 and following.
121 d’Elia translation, cited, p. 271.
122 d’Elia translation, cited, p. 273.
123 d’Elia translation, cited, pp. 242-243.
124 d’Elia translation, cited, p. 223 and following. Dr. Hsü (cited, p.
263 and following) translates these four epochs as following: _hung
fang_, “the stage of the great wilderness”; _shen ch’üan_, “the
state of theocracy”; _chun ch’üan_, “the stage of monarchy”; and
_min ch’üan_, “the stage of democracy.”
125 d’Elia translation, cited, pp. 241-242.
126 Linebarger, _Conversations_, cited, Book II, ch. 2.
127 It is of interest to note that the “New Life Movement” inaugurated
by Chiang Chieh-shih is concerned with many such petty matters such
as those enumerated above. Each of these small problems is in itself
of little consequence; in the aggregate they loom large.
128 d’Elia translation, cited, p. 331.
129 Hsü translation, cited, p. 352. It is interesting to note that the
translation by Father d’Elia gives a more literal translation of the
names that Sun Yat-sen applied to these categories. He translates
the Chinese terms as _pre-seeing_, _post-seeing_, and _non-seeing_.
130 Hsü translation, cited, p. 352.
131 d’Elia translation, cited, p. 348.
132 d’Elia translation, cited, p. 352. Sun Yat-sen defined democracy
thus: “... under a republican government, the people is sovereign.”
133 Tai Chi-tao, cited, p. 25, refers to this distinction as being
between force (_Gewalt_) and power (_Macht_). To the people
belonged, and rightfully, the force which could sanction or refuse
to sanction the existence of the government and the confirmation of
its policies. The government had the power (_Macht_), which the
people did not have, of formulating intelligent policies and
carrying them out in an organized manner.
134 Liang Chi-ch’ao, cited, pp. 50-52.
135 d’Elia translation, cited, pp. 279 and following.
136 d’Elia translation, cited, p. 368.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account