The Political Doctrines of Sun Yat-sen: An Exposition of the San Min Chu ILinebarger, Paul Myron Anthony
History
The Political Doctrines of Sun Yat-sen: An Exposition of the San Min Chu I
Linebarger, Paul Myron Anthony
Sun, Yat-sen, 1866-1925. San min zhu yi
269 The article by Tsui, cited, p. 177 and following, goes into a quite
detailed comparison of the Chinese Nationalist and the Marxian
Communist theories of the three stages of revolution. He draws
attention to the fact that, while the Communists do not speak of
"three stages" and prefer to emphasize the transitional stage of the
dictatorship of the proletariat, the two theories are similar almost
to the point of being identical.
270 Tsui, cited, p. 181.
271 Tyau, cited, p. 439 and following. It is also available in Hsü, _Sun
Yat-sen_, cited above, p. 85 and following. The Tyau translation was
preferred since it was written by an official of the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs, and may be regarded as the work of a Government
spokesman. It is interesting, by way of contrast, to quote a passage
from the Constitution of the Chinese Soviet Republic, so-called:
“The Chinese Soviet Government is building up a state of the
democratic dictatorship [sic!] of the workers and peasants. All
power shall be vested in the Soviets of Workers, Peasants, and Red
Army men.” _Fundamental Laws of the Chinese Soviet Republic_, New
York, 1934, p. 18. The absence of an acknowledged period of
tutelage, in view of the unfamiliarity of the Chinese people with
democratic forms, is significant. The constitutional jurisprudence
of the Chinese Communists is, however, primarily a matter of
academic interest, since the Soviets, where they have existed, have
existed in a state of perpetual emergency, shielded by the Red
Terror and other devices of revolutionary control. The contrast
between a pronouncement of Sun Yat-sen and a constitution is a fair
one, since the writings of Sun Yat-sen form the final authority in
the Nationalist movement and government; in a dispute as to the
higher validity of a governmental provision or a flat contrary
statement of Sun Yat-sen, there can be little question as to which
would—or, in the eyes of the Nationalists, should—prevail.
272 It is interesting to note that the institution which most Western
writers would incline to regard as the very key-stone of democracy,
parliament, has a quite inferior place in the Sun Yat-sen system. In
the National Government of China, the Legislative Yuan is more like
a department than like a chamber. This question, however, will be
discussed under the heading of the Five Rights.
273 d’Elia translation, cited, p. 341.
274 d’Elia translation, cited, p. 342.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account