Fiction -- History and criticism; Political fiction -- History and criticism; Politics in literature
Two years later Sinclair threw himself into a vindication of the
characters and lives of Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti. The cast
of _Boston_ (1928) includes the fictitious Thornewell family, but they
are all dwarfed by the two Italians whose careers ended in the electric
chair. Sinclair presents the case as an effort by the city and state
governments to dispose of two representatives of the anarchist movement
which was thought to threaten society’s foundations. He maintains that
the government was supported in its attempt by representatives of
organized religion as well as the socially prominent and economically
powerful classes. Although the author said that he had tried to be a
historian, that he had not “written a brief for the Sacco-Vanzetti
defense,” the novel is precisely that. It is also an indictment of most
of the immediate society in which the events took place. He accuses the
prosecution of carefully building an illegal, trumped-up case heard by
the violently prejudiced Judge Thayer. He declares that the Commission
which investigated the case, made up of Cardinal O’Connell, Bishop
Lawrence, and President Lowell of Harvard, rendered an endorsement of
the state’s actions which amounted to a whitewash. Running parallel
to the story of the Italians is that of Jerry Walker, parvenu tycoon
of the New England felt industry who is legally plundered by the old
commercial and banking interests of Boston and New York. Mr. Sinclair’s
intentions to be impartial may have been sincere, but like the
exclamation points in his prose, they got away from him.
=Growing Political Consciousness: 1930 to 1954=
The great wave of political consciousness which struck America in
the 1930s surged over into the novel. It took several forms. There
was the novel which advocated liberal reforms in government, and the
novel which, presenting the Communist point of view, necessarily went
farther. The proletarian novel emerged. Sympathetically describing the
privations of the so-called proletariat to stimulate betterment of its
living conditions, these novels sometimes cleaved to the Communist
Party line but were often the work of non-Communist authors writing
from genuine concern for their subjects. The Communists regarded this
art form as another weapon in the class struggle. Paul Drummond, a
fanatical Communist writer in James T. Farrell’s _Yet Other Waters_
(1952), shouts that “now the time has come for Party literature.” Moses
Kallisch, leader of a front organization starting a Left Wing Book
Club, declares, “The day is not far off when we’ll overwhelm bourgeois
culture in America!” Increasing consciousness of the political
malignancy of Fascism and Nazism appeared in the novel. With the
descriptions of these dangers came appeals for the strengthening and
defense of the best in the American political system.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account