Fiction -- History and criticism; Political fiction -- History and criticism; Politics in literature
And his feelings about the need for preventing it
are clear.
=Joseph Conrad: Early Cloak and Dagger=
In 1907 Joseph Conrad explored this problem from the same point of view
in _The Secret Agent_. In the author’s note which introduced the novel,
Conrad wrote that a friend had mentioned anarchist activities. This was
the germ of the story:
I remember, however, remarking on the criminal futility of the
whole thing, doctrine, action, mentality; and on the contemptible
aspect of the half-crazy pose as of a brazen cheat exploiting the
poignant miseries and passionate credulities of a mankind always so
tragically eager for self-destruction. That was what made for me
its philosophical pretences so unpardonable.
Conrad then had his point of view; his recollection of an attempt to
blow up the Greenwich Observatory gave him the outlines of his plot. A
“delegate of the Central Red Committee,” Adolf Verloc is actually an
informer and agent provocateur for many years in the pay of the embassy
of a “great power” (probably Russia). His principal function is to
transmit warnings of planned bomb-throwings to insure the safety of
“royal, imperial, or grand-ducal journeys....” Called to the embassy,
Verloc is told by first secretary Vladimir that the conference in Milan
is lagging in its “deliberations upon international action for the
suppression of political crime....” England is chiefly responsible,
Vladimir tells him. He orders Verloc to provide a stimulus in the
form of an attack “with all the shocking senselessness of gratuitous
blasphemy.” Verloc is ordered to blow up the Observatory. Always a
businessman and never a terrorist, he is deeply disturbed. Obtaining
a bomb, Verloc sends his admiring half-wit brother-in-law Stevie out
with it. But Stevie stumbles and blows up himself rather than the
Observatory. When Verloc’s wife learns what has happened, she kills him
and then commits suicide. To add to the impact of the story, Conrad
wove into it the characters of Karl Yundt, an evil old terrorist, and
the Professor, a “perfect anarchist” who spends his life in experiments
to develop the perfect detonator. In _The Great Tradition_ F. R.
Leavis has rightly called this book “one of Conrad’s two supreme
masterpieces.” In its structure, its delineation of personality, and
its masterful manipulation of point of view, the book is a classic. It
is an example of the superiority of the European political novel, one
of the finest works in the entire genre.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account