The Popular Science Monthly, August, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900 — John Shaqi
The Popular Science Monthly, August, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900Various
Science
The Popular Science Monthly, August, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900
Various
Science -- Periodicals; Technology -- Periodicals
Any one who has stood near a large naval gun during its discharge,
will, I think, be prepared to admit that the sound of the explosion
affects not only the ears, but the whole body as well, which
experiences something not unlike a sudden blow. This blow, or
concussion, as it is generally termed, is merely the impact of the wave
of compressed air, spreading out in all directions around the gun. In
the case of ordinary sounds, the compression of the air in the wave is
so slight that only the delicate auditory nerves respond to the impact,
hence we naturally conclude that sounds are perceived only by the ear.
When dealing with sounds of very great intensity, this notion must be
somewhat modified, for they certainly can be felt as well as heard. In
some extreme cases, in fact, the sensation of feeling may be stronger
than that of hearing, as in the case of which I shall speak presently.
Is it also possible that we can perceive sound through the medium of
any other sense organ, say the eye? ‘To see a noise’ certainly sounds
like an absurdity; yet under certain conditions, sound waves in air
can be made as distinctly visible as the ripples on a pond surrounding
the splash of a stone. That they are not seen under ordinary
conditions does not justify us in assuming them to be invisible. We
all know that the currents of hot air rising from a stove, while not
usually conspicuous, can be made visible by properly regulating the
illumination, as by looking along the surface of the stove towards a
window. The hot air is visible because in its optical properties it is
different from the cold air surrounding it. The rays of light, passing
through the unequally heated portions of the air, are bent in different
directions, causing a distortion of objects seen through the heated
currents. What we see, strictly speaking, is not the hot air itself,
but a wavering and swimming of the objects seen through it. Yet I think
we are justified in saying that the eye perceives the hot air.
Now sound waves in air, which are merely regions where the air is
somewhat compressed, differ in their optical properties from the
uncompressed portions, just as the hot air differs from the cold.
As the pictures illustrating this article testify, they may be seen
and photographed under proper conditions of illumination as readily
as solid objects. We must remember, in the first place, that a sound
wave travels with a velocity something greater than a thousand feet a
second, rather less than the speed of a modern rifle ball, yet ten
times faster than the fastest express train. The wave, even if it were
stationary, could be seen only by adjusting the illumination with far
greater care than was necessary in the case of the hot air, and we
consequently can easily understand why we never see the waves under
ordinary conditions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account