Botany; Geotropism; Plants -- Irritability and movements
possible, or even probable, that this tendency to reversion may have
been increased, as it is manifestly of service to the plant.
[14] The facts on which the following conclusions are founded are
given in ‘The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication,’
2nd edit. 1875. On the causes leading to reversion see chap. xii. vol.
ii. and p. 59, chap. xiv. On peloric flowers, chap. xiii. p. 32; and
see p. 337 on their position on the plant. With respect to seeds, p.
340. On reversion by means of buds, p. 438, chap. xi. vol. i.
A SUMMARY OF CHAPTER.
A part or organ may be called sensitive, when its irritation excites
movement in an adjoining part. Now it has been shown in this chapter,
that the tip of the radicle of the bean is in this sense sensitive to
the contact of any small object attached to one side by shellac or
gum-water; also to a slight touch with dry caustic, and to a thin slice
cut off one side. The radicles of the pea were tried with attached
objects and caustic, both of which acted. With Phaseolus multiflorus
the tip was hardly sensitive to small squares of attached card, but was
sensitive to caustic and to slicing. The radicles of Tropaeolum were
highly sensitive to contact; and so, as far as we could judge, were
those of Gossypium herbaceum, and they were certainly sensitive to
caustic. The tips of the radicles of Cucurbita ovifera were likewise
highly sensitive to caustic, though only moderately so to contact.
Raphanus sativus offered a somewhat doubtful case. With Æsculus the
tips were quite indifferent to bodies attached to them, though
sensitive to caustic. Those of Quercus robur and Zea mays were highly
sensitive to contact, as were the radicles of the latter to caustic. In
several of these cases the difference in sensitiveness of the tip to
contact and to caustic was, as we believe, merely apparent; for with
Gossypium, Raphanus, and Cucurbita, the tip was so fine and flexible
that it was very difficult to attach any object to one of its sides.
With the radicles of Æsculus, the tips were not at all sensitive to
small bodies attached to them; but it does not follow from this
fact that they would not have been sensitive to somewhat greater
continued pressure, if this could have been applied.
The peculiar form of sensitiveness which we are here considering, is
confined to the tip of the radicle for a length of from 1 mm. to 1.5
mm. When this part is irritated by contact with any object, by caustic,
or by a thin slice being cut off, the upper adjoining part of the
radicle, for a length of from 6 or 7 to even 12 mm., is excited to bend
away from the side which has been irritated. Some influence must
therefore be transmitted from the tip along the radicle for this
length. The curvature thus caused is generally symmetrical. The part
which bends most apparently coincides with that of the most rapid
growth. The tip and the basal part grow very slowly and they bend very
little.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account