The Press-Gang Afloat and AshoreHutchinson, J. R. (John Robert)
History
The Press-Gang Afloat and Ashore
Hutchinson, J. R. (John Robert)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Impressment
A stout-hearted fellow named Browne, who hailed from Chester, would have
made Caradine a fitting mate. "Being impressed into the sea service, he
very violently determined, in order to extricate himself therefrom, to
mutilate the thumb and a finger of his left hand; which he accomplished
by repeatedly maiming them with an old hatchet that he had obtained
for that purpose. He was immediately discharged." [Footnote: _Liverpool
Advertiser_, 6 June 1777.] Such men as these were a substantial loss to
the service. Fighting a gun shoulder to shoulder, what fearful execution
would they not have wrought upon the "hereditary enemy"!
It did not always do, however, to presume upon the loss of a forefinger,
particularly if it were missing from the left hand. Capt. Barker, while
he was regulating the press at Bristol, once had occasion to send into
Ilchester for a couple of brace of convicts who had received the royal
pardon on condition of their serving at sea. Near Shepton Mallet, on the
return tramp, his gangsmen fell in with a party armed with sticks and
knives, who "beat and cut them in a very cruel manner." They succeeded,
however, in taking the ringleader, one Charles Biggen, and brought him
in; but when Barker would have discharged the fellow because his left
forefinger was wanting, the Admiralty brushed the customary rule
aside and ordered him to be kept. [Footnote: _Admiralty Records_ 1.
1528--Capt. Barker, 28 July 1803, and endorsement.]
The main considerations entering into the dispatch of pressed men to the
fleet, when at length their period of detention at headquarters came to
an end, were economy, speed and safety. Transport was necessarily either
by land or water, and in the case of seaport, river or canal towns, both
modes were of course available. Gangs operating at a distance from the
sea, or remote from a navigable river or canal, were from their very
situation obliged to send their catch to market either wholly by
land, or by land and water successively. Land transport, though always
healthier, and in many instances speedier and cheaper than transport by
water, was nevertheless much more risky. Pressed men therefore preferred
it. The risks--rescue and desertion--were all in their favour. Hence,
when they "offered chearfully to walk up," or down, as the case might
be, the seeming magnanimity of the offer was never permitted to blind
those in charge of them to the need for a strong attendant guard.
[Footnote: In the spring of 1795 a body of Quota Men, some 130 strong,
voluntarily marched from Liverpool to London, a distance of 182 miles,
instead of travelling by coach as at first proposed. Though all had
received the bounty and squandered it in debauchery, not a man deserted;
and in their case the danger of rescue was of course absent. _Admiralty
Records_ 1. 1511--Capt. Bowen, 21 April 1795.] The men would have had
to walk in any case, for transport by coach, though occasionally
sanctioned, was an event of rare occurrence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account