The Principles of Chemistry, Volume IIMendeleyev, Dmitry Ivanovich
Science
The Principles of Chemistry, Volume II
Mendeleyev, Dmitry Ivanovich
Argon; Chemistry; Periodic law
Hence it is evident that isomorphism--that is, the analogy of forms and
the property of inducing crystallisation--may serve as a means for the
discovery of analogies in molecular composition. We will take an example
in order to render this clear. If, instead of aluminium sulphate, we add
magnesium sulphate to potassium sulphate, then, on evaporating the
solution, the double salt K_{2}MgS_{2}O_{8},6H_{2}O (Chapter XIV., Note
28) separates instead of an alum, and the ratio of the component parts
(in alums one atom of potassium per 2SO_{4}, and here two atoms) and the
amount of water of crystallisation (in alums 12, and here 6 equivalents
per 2SO_{4}) are quite different; nor is this double salt in any way
isomorphous with the alums, nor capable of forming an isomorphous
crystalline mixture with them, nor does the one salt provoke the
crystallisation of the other. From this we must conclude that although
alumina and magnesia, or aluminium and magnesium, resemble each other,
they are not isomorphous, and that although they give partially similar
double salts, these salts are not analogous to each other. And this is
expressed in their chemical formulæ by the fact that the number of atoms
in alumina or aluminium oxide, Al_{2}O_{3}, is different from the number
in magnesia, MgO. Aluminium is trivalent and magnesium bivalent. Thus,
having obtained a double salt from a given metal, it is possible to judge
of the analogy of the given metal with aluminium or with magnesium, or of
the absence of such an analogy, from the composition and form of this
salt. Thus zinc, for example, does not form alums, but forms a double
salt with potassium sulphate, which has a composition exactly like that
of the corresponding salt of magnesium. It is often possible to
distinguish the bivalent metals analogous to magnesium or calcium from
the trivalent metals, like aluminium, by such a method. Furthermore, the
specific heat and vapour density serve as guides. There are also indirect
proofs. Thus iron gives ferrous compounds, FeX_{2}, which are isomorphous
with the compounds of magnesium, and ferric compounds, FeX_{3}, which are
isomorphous with the compounds of aluminium; in this instance the
relative composition is directly determined by analysis, because, for a
given amount of iron, FeCl_{2} only contains two-thirds of the amount of
chlorine which occurs in FeCl_{3}, and the composition of the
corresponding oxygen compounds, _i.e._ of ferrous oxide, FeO, and ferric
oxide, Fe_{2}O_{3}, clearly indicates the analogy of the ferrous oxide
with MgO and of the ferric oxide with Al_{2}O_{3}.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account