The Principles of Leather Manufacture — John Shaqi
The Principles of Leather ManufactureProcter, H. R. (Henry Richardson)
History
The Principles of Leather Manufacture
Procter, H. R. (Henry Richardson)
Leather
In the case of sole leather, these processes may require from two to
twelve months for completion; after which the leather is dried,
smoothed, and compressed by mechanical means, and is then ready for use.
Dressing-leathers, ranging from calf-skins to harness-hides, receive a
much shorter tannage, and the subsequent treatment with fats and oils,
which, together with mechanical manipulations, constitute “currying.”
The thin film of grease distributed over the surface of the fibres
renders them supple, and to some extent waterproof.
The lighter fancy leathers, such as morocco, are dyed, and undergo many
complex processes to fit them for their required purposes and improve
their appearance.
Many skins such as calf, glove, and glacé kid, are not tanned, but
“tawed” by a solution of alum and salt, which is often supplemented with
mixtures of flour and egg-yolk to fill and soften the leather.
Salts of chromium are also employed in place of alum and salt, and
produce an equally soft, but more permanent and enduring leather.
Lastly, wash-leather, or so-called “chamois,” and buff-leather are
produced by fulling the prepared pelt with fish or whale oil, which
converts the skin into leather by subsequent oxidation, during which
aldehydes are evolved.
CHAPTER III.
_THE LIVING CELL._
The larger part of the materials employed in leather manufacture are
organic in their origin, and the skin itself is an organised structure,
while the life-processes of putrefaction and fermentation play a large
part in the tannery. Some knowledge, therefore, of biological structures
and processes is necessary to a full understanding of much which
follows, and a few words are not out of place with regard to the
foundations of life itself.
The bricks of which all living structures are built are the living
“cells” and their products, and these first elements differ little, if
at all, whether the life is animal or vegetable, the distinction being
produced rather by the way in which they are put together, than by
differences in the cells themselves. This is so much the case that it is
often difficult to decide in which of the two classes to place the
simplest organisms, since most of these forms are capable of active
movement, and their modes of nutrition and reproduction are common to
both kingdoms.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account