The Problem of 'Edwin Drood': A Study in the Methods of DickensNicoll, W. Robertson (William Robertson), Sir
General
The Problem of 'Edwin Drood': A Study in the Methods of Dickens
Nicoll, W. Robertson (William Robertson), Sir
Cathedrals in literature; Dickens, Charles, 1812-1870. Mystery of Edwin Drood; Murder in literature
Now, as to the figures at the angles and the scene at the top there
is general agreement. As to those on the left, H. J. is, I think,
right in calling the upper one Rosa’s flight; but the lower one
_cannot_ be Jasper and Rosa. The young man has a moustache. Jasper
had none, and has none in the two pictures of him on this same cover.
Also, the artist has carefully emphasised the fact that the girl is
indifferent to her suitor. The figures, I believe, represent Rosa
and Neville Landless.
On the right, H. J. assumes that there are two scenes. I am clear
that there is but one: for, whereas, on the left side the two scenes
are separated by a sprig of the rose-wreath which surrounds the
centre, and a similar sprig parts them from the top scene, there is
on the right only the division from the top scene, managed in the
same way as on the left. And yet, had the scene been two, there was
great necessity to separate them, inasmuch as they are taking place
in the same surroundings, namely, the winding staircase. As to the
identity of the three men, the lowest one is a cleric, Crisparkle,
the next above him I will not identify; the uppermost is either
Jasper or just possibly (since he is pointing pretty directly at the
figure of Jasper in the top scene, and seems to be acting as a guide
to those below him) Datchery.
Dr. James dissents from Dr. Jackson as to the central vignette at the
bottom. No phantom of the imagination is there. We have a real person,
as is shown by the fact that he casts a shadow on the wall behind him.
MR. HUGH THOMSON’S READING
Mr. Hugh Thomson wrote the following notes on 3rd April 1912, and they
are now printed for the first time:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account