The Problem of 'Edwin Drood': A Study in the Methods of DickensNicoll, W. Robertson (William Robertson), Sir
General
The Problem of 'Edwin Drood': A Study in the Methods of Dickens
Nicoll, W. Robertson (William Robertson), Sir
Cathedrals in literature; Dickens, Charles, 1812-1870. Mystery of Edwin Drood; Murder in literature
But to get to the cover to which you particularly directed my
attention. It was designed, I take it, primarily as a decoration,
and not as a series of representations of the characters to appear in
the book. Consequently, there is but little definite
character-drawing in any of the groups with the exception of the one
at the bottom of the page, where Jasper is depicted exactly as I
should wish him depicted, dark and saturnine ‘with thick, lustrous
black hair and whiskers.’ If the other figure is merely a wraith
conjured up by Jasper’s evil opium-soaked conscience, it is as
substantial as one of the ghosts of Hamlet’s father given to us on
the stage time after time without protest. But in a black and white
design for a popular serial it is scarcely possible to be subtle, and
at the same time plainly intelligible. So it may be a ghost, or it
may be Edwin in the flesh, or Neville Landless got up to represent
Edwin. It is a very effective little cut. In the other groups,
Jasper is not so unmistakable, but, of course, in the upper drawings
the sleek, clerical-looking personage with his hand at his mouth is
meant to represent Jasper. The staircase groups, I can’t identify.
The young men in both may be meant to represent Jasper. They are not
in the least like that sombre personage, but just colourless young
men. In the garden scene one cannot think that the kneeling figure
pressing the girl’s fingers to his lips is meant for Jasper at all.
It has a mop of fair hair and boasts a moustache, and in the scene in
the garden of the Nuns’ House Rosa did not permit Jasper to approach
her so nearly. In the picture there is no suggestion of the
repugnance and fear with which she regarded Jasper. Don’t you think
it reasonable to suggest that this little picture illustrates a scene
to take place much later in the book, a scene Dickens did not live to
write? It might be Edwin Drood returned from abroad or from
disguise. Edwin Drood making love to Helena Landless. In chapter
viii. he was ‘already enough impressed by Helena to feel indignant
that Helena’s brother should dispose of him (Edwin) so coolly’ to
Rosebud.
Or could it be Tartar proposing to Rosebud? But Tartar had no
moustache either as himself or as Datchery, and the girl’s figure has
a suggestion of lithe dignity which I don’t associate with the
‘little beauty’ Rosebud.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account