The Problem of 'Edwin Drood': A Study in the Methods of DickensNicoll, W. Robertson (William Robertson), Sir
General
The Problem of 'Edwin Drood': A Study in the Methods of Dickens
Nicoll, W. Robertson (William Robertson), Sir
Cathedrals in literature; Dickens, Charles, 1812-1870. Mystery of Edwin Drood; Murder in literature
I agree with the author of _About Edwin Drood_ that Edwin was not
worth while bringing back, but it is possible that he was to return,
and that this is he in the garden scene. In the space above this the
female figure scanning a placard ‘LOST’ is, I think, merely
allegorical, and not meant to represent Rosebud fleeing from Jasper.
In the book she leaves Cloisterham so neat and pretty that Joe, the
omnibus man, would have liked to keep for himself the love she sent
to Miss Twinkleton.
MR. CUMING WALTERS’S READING
There is another view to which I strongly incline, first stated by Mr.
Cuming Walters. I take the erect figure in the bottom vignette to be
Datchery. It is not Edwin. The large hat and the tightish surtout are
the articles of clothing on which Dickens lays stress in his description
of Datchery. Mr. Lang says that the figure is that of a young man in a
longish loose greatcoat, not a tightish surtout such as Datchery wore,
but I agree with Mr. Cuming Walters that the figure corresponds with the
description of Datchery. Edwin as seen above with Rosa in the cathedral
is not wearing a coat of this sort. His hat also is different. On
examining the figure Mr. H. B. Irving said to me: ‘That looks uncommonly
like a woman in disguise.’
None of us has a right to dogmatise, but the variety of opinions among
those who have studied the cover shows that no certain conclusion can be
drawn from the illustrations. The arguments advanced previously tend to
make this practically certain. In the discussion of the problem a wholly
disproportionate weight has been laid on the illustrated cover. It would
hardly bear that weight even if every one were agreed as to the reading
of the pictures, and there is no such agreement.
CHAPTER IV—THE METHODS OF DICKENS
HALF-WAY IN DICKENS
Dickens has left us one-half of his last story. It was to be completed
in twelve parts, and six parts were published. We can only infer and
guess at the way in which the author would have completed it. Would he
have brought many new characters on the stage, or are we to believe that
the main characters are already there, and that it is through the
revealing of their secrets that the end is to be reached? To give a
positive reply is impossible, and yet we may learn something of Dickens’s
methods by studying his complete books. Supposing we had only one-half
of each book in our possession, might we expect that the complete story
would introduce us to many fresh characters? I give the results of some
investigations from the later novels.
THE LENGTH OF DICKENS’S NOVELS
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account