The Problem of 'Edwin Drood': A Study in the Methods of DickensNicoll, W. Robertson (William Robertson), Sir
General
The Problem of 'Edwin Drood': A Study in the Methods of Dickens
Nicoll, W. Robertson (William Robertson), Sir
Cathedrals in literature; Dickens, Charles, 1812-1870. Mystery of Edwin Drood; Murder in literature
The same impression is left upon me by his unfinished novel. Those who
dislike Dickens’s later manner may easily find faults. They may say that
Honeythunder is grotesque rather than amusing. They may say that
Jasper’s courtship of Rosa is melodramatic and wolfish. I confess to
being perpetually puzzled by the account of Neville’s capture on the
morning after the murder. Why was he pursued in that manner? All that
was known against him was that he had been with Edwin on the previous
night. He is only eight miles away from Cloisterham, and stopping at a
roadside tavern to refresh. He starts again on his journey, and becomes
aware of other pedestrians behind him coming up at a faster pace than
his. He stands aside to let them pass, but only four pass. Other four
slackened speed, and loitered as if intending to follow him when he
should go on. The remainder of the party (half a dozen, perhaps) turn
and go back at a great rate. Among those who go back is Mr. Crisparkle.
Nobody speaks, but they all look at him. Four walk in advance and four
in the rear. Thus he is beset, and stops as a last test, and they all
stop. He asks:
‘Why do you attend upon me in this way? . . . Are you a pack of
thieves?’
‘Don’t answer him,’ said one of the number. . . . ‘Better be quiet.
. . .’
‘I will not submit to be penned in,’ says Neville; ‘I mean to pass
those four in front.’
They all stand still, and he shoulders his heavy stick and quickens his
pace. The largest and strongest man of the number dexterously closes
with him and goes down with him, but not before the heavy stick has
descended smartly. Naturally Neville is utterly bewildered. Two of them
hold his arms and lead him back into a group whose central figures are
Jasper and Crisparkle. Why on earth did not Crisparkle speak to him at
the beginning, and tell him what had happened? All this is
somnambulistic.
There seems to be a slight slip in chapter ii.
Jasper’s room at the Gatehouse is described. It has an unfinished
picture of a blooming schoolgirl hanging over the chimneypiece. At the
upper end of the room Mr. Jasper opens a door and discloses a small inner
room pleasantly lighted and prepared for supper.
‘Fixed as the look the young fellow meets is, there is yet in it some
strange power of suddenly including the sketch over the chimneypiece.’
They dine in the inner room. The cloth is drawn, and a dish of walnuts
and a decanter of rich coloured sherry are placed upon the table.
‘How’s she looking, Jack?’
Mr. Jasper’s concentrated face again includes the portrait as he returns:
‘Very like your sketch indeed.’
‘I am a little proud of it,’ says the young fellow, glancing up at the
sketch with complacency, and then shutting one eye, and taking a
corrected prospect of it over a level bridge of nut-crackers in the air.
Dickens seems to have forgotten that the sketch is in the other room.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account