The Problem of 'Edwin Drood': A Study in the Methods of DickensNicoll, W. Robertson (William Robertson), Sir
General
The Problem of 'Edwin Drood': A Study in the Methods of Dickens
Nicoll, W. Robertson (William Robertson), Sir
Cathedrals in literature; Dickens, Charles, 1812-1870. Mystery of Edwin Drood; Murder in literature
It seems to me that these are slips, but I do not find any other readers
have taken the same view. With these exceptions, the story seems to be
one of Dickens’s best books. Its grasp of local colour and detail is as
strong as ever it was. There is much of his old humour in the Mayor, in
Miss Twinkleton’s Girls’ School, in Billickin, in Durdles and his
attendant imp. Also the story is constructed with the greatest care and
ingenuity. Any one who carefully goes over the manuscript and the proofs
will see that Dickens had a plan in his mind that he half revealed and
half concealed, that his phrases and details are chosen with the nicest
care, and that he meant to reward those who at the end could take a
‘backward look’ by the delight they would experience in seeing how
everything had been scrupulously planned and artistically conducted to a
climax. We cannot do justice to the book in its present state. But
Dickens’s royal genius was at its full, and would have vindicated itself.
He had set himself deliberately to carrying out a plot far more exact
than he had ever attempted, and the end was in view from the beginning.
This is not to say that the reason of every incident and every
description was disclosed from the first. I have previously discussed
Edgar Allan Poe’s reading of _Barnaby Rudge_, and shown that his
perception, keen as it was, yielded him less than he thought. I have
shown how Dickens prepared the plan for _Little Dorrit_ from the start of
his book. It may be traced now, but without the ‘backward glance’ it
would not have been easy to trace it.
We may also say with some confidence that no new characters of importance
would have been introduced to us in the second half. In the chapter
‘Half Way with Dickens’ I have shown that this is the case with five of
his principal books. The conclusion is not stringent, for Dickens was
free to change his method. But it may be said to be highly probable; if
it is true we are left to conjecture the part that the various characters
would have played in the winding up of the tale.
The book was to end with the capture and conviction of Jasper. I have
already written of the part played and to be played by Grewgious.
Another hunter of Jasper was Durdles. The task assigned to Durdles among
the hunters is fairly clear. Sooner or later, by tapping round the
Sapsea monument he is to discover the presence of ‘a wheen banes,’ or at
least of some unsuspected ‘rubbish.’ He had put the inscription on the
monument before Christmas, and had no doubt satisfied himself then that
all was safe. ‘When Durdles puts a touch or a finish upon his work, no
matter where, inside or outside, Durdles likes to look at his work all
round, and see that his work is a-doing him credit.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account