The Problem of 'Edwin Drood': A Study in the Methods of DickensNicoll, W. Robertson (William Robertson), Sir
General
The Problem of 'Edwin Drood': A Study in the Methods of Dickens
Nicoll, W. Robertson (William Robertson), Sir
Cathedrals in literature; Dickens, Charles, 1812-1870. Mystery of Edwin Drood; Murder in literature
Having made his inspection when the epitaph was put on, Durdles would
have no further curiosity about the tomb until, in the following summer,
he took Mr. Datchery on a rambling expedition as he had taken Jasper.
His peculiar gift, like that of the bloodhound, is to aid in tracking
down the quarry.
Deputy has also his part to play. From the first Jasper hates and fears
Deputy, and there are signs near the close of _Edwin Drood_ that this
strange boy, who has some characteristics in common with Dickie Sludge,
of _Kenilworth_, is to form a close alliance with Datchery. The ugliest
side of Jasper’s character displays itself in his treatment of the ‘young
imp employed by Durdles.’ The chanting of the line, ‘Widdy Widdy
Wake-cock warning,’ has for him a note of menace. With the fury of a
devil he leaps upon the boy when he emerges from the crypt with Durdles,
and hears a sharp whistle rending the silence. ‘I will shed the blood of
that impish wretch!’ he cries; ‘I know I shall do it.’ Durdles has to
appeal to him not to hurt the boy. ‘He followed us to-night, when we
first came here,’ says Jasper. ‘He has been prowling near us ever
since.’
Deputy denies both accusations. ‘I’d only just come out for my ’elth
when I see you two a-coming out of the Kinfreederal.’
What has Deputy actually seen? He may have testimony to give of the most
vital consequence, but even if he has seen nothing of Jasper’s movements
while Durdles lies asleep, or of his approach to the Sapsea monument, he
will tell Mr. Datchery of that furious onslaught when Jasper clutched his
throat and threatened to kill him. He will prove a very useful ally of
the hunters.
It seems quite inconceivable that either Durdles or Deputy could have
known the whole secret and kept it. Neither of them was capable of
keeping a secret long. But they might have suspicions, and they might
and would know circumstances which when rightly interpreted led to the
inevitable conclusion.
I cannot but think that the chief part in the coming narrative was to be
played by the opium woman. The novel from the very first page has a
touch of the East. In Wilkie Collins’s _The Moonstone_ the Indians did
their part, and then vanished from the scene. But in _Edwin Drood_ we
have the Landlesses from Ceylon with a touch of dark blood, or at least
of the Eastern spirit. Mr. Lang is in excess of the facts when he calls
them Eurasians, and Dickens hesitates in ascribing black blood to them.
They are more probably gypsies. We have also the connection of Edwin
Drood with the East. There is more than a suggestion of dark blood in
John Jasper. Above all, we have the opium woman. What was the
connection between John Jasper and the opium woman? What was John
Jasper’s history before he came to Cloisterham?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account