The Profligate: A Play in Four ActsPinero, Arthur Wing
General
The Profligate: A Play in Four Acts
Pinero, Arthur Wing
English drama -- 19th century; Man-woman relationships -- Drama; Married people -- Drama
[_Handing a bundle of legal documents to HUGH._] “Dangars v. Dangars.”
Oh, excuse me, but Mr. Renshaw has sent in some little nosegays with a
request that they should be worn to-day. [_Sniffing the flower in his
buttonhole._] As the wedding takes place from the office, as it were,
I considered it would be a permissible compliment to our client, the
bride----
HUGH MURRAY.
Quite so--very kind of Mr. Renshaw.
EPHGRAVES.
I shouldn’t have mentioned it, but I see you’re not wearing yours.
HUGH MURRAY.
Oh, this is from Mr. Renshaw?
EPHGRAVES.
Yes.
HUGH MURRAY.
We are keeping Lord Dangars waiting.
[_EPHGRAVES goes into the clerk’s office, as HUGH takes a flower from
a glass on the table._]
I can’t wear it--I can’t wear it, at _her_ wedding.
[_EPHGRAVES ushers in LORD DANGARS, a dissipated-looking man of about
forty, dressed in the height of fashion._]
LORD DANGARS.
Good morning, Mr. Murray.
HUGH MURRAY.
Good morning. Pray sit down.
LORD DANGARS.
I don’t want to bother you, you know, but my servant, who has been
reading the newspapers for me since my damned--I beg your pardon--since
my divorce business has been before the public, says that we were in
Court again yesterday.
HUGH MURRAY.
Oh, yes. The Decree _Nisi_ has been made absolute on the application of
the petitioner.
LORD DANGARS.
The Petitioner. Let me see--they call me the Respondent, don’t they?
HUGH MURRAY.
They do--[_under his breath_] amongst other things.
LORD DANGARS.
It’s a deuced odd circumstance that I have been nearly everything in
divorce cases, but _never_ a petitioner. Decree _Nisi_ made absolute,
eh? That means I am quite free, doesn’t it?
HUGH MURRAY.
Certainly.
LORD DANGARS.
And eligible?
HUGH MURRAY.
I beg pardon?
LORD DANGARS.
I can marry again?
HUGH MURRAY.
You could marry again if you thought proper.
LORD DANGARS.
You wouldn’t call it improper?
HUGH MURRAY.
If you ask me that as your solicitor I answer No. Otherwise I have what
are perhaps peculiar notions as to the eligibility of a man who marries.
LORD DANGARS.
Oh, have you! Well, I don’t see that a man’s eligibility requires any
further qualification than that of his being single. You differ?
HUGH MURRAY.
May I speak honestly, Lord Dangars?
LORD DANGARS.
Do. I admire anything of that sort. I think your partner told me you
were a Scotchman and new to London. I like to encounter a man in his
honest stage.
HUGH MURRAY.
Thank you. Then you will allow me to maintain that the man who marries
a good woman knowing that his past life is not as spotless as hers
grievously wrongs his wife and fools himself.
LORD DANGARS.
As for wronging _her_, that’s an abstract question of sentiment. But I
don’t see how the man is a fool.
HUGH MURRAY.
A man is a fool to bind himself to one who sooner or later must learn
what little need there is to respect her husband.
LORD DANGARS.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account