The Progress of Ethnology: An Account of Recent Archaeological, Philological and Geographical Researches in Various Parts of the Globe, Tending to Elucidate the Physical History of ManBartlett, John Russell
History
The Progress of Ethnology: An Account of Recent Archaeological, Philological and Geographical Researches in Various Parts of the Globe, Tending to Elucidate the Physical History of Man
Bartlett, John Russell
Anthropology -- History; Ethnology -- History
According to the analogy of the Pehlvi inscriptions, decyphered by De
Sacy, it was believed that the inscriptions then under consideration,
mentioned the name of a king son of another king, that is the names of
father and son. M. Grotefend first examined the bas-reliefs at
Persepolis, to ascertain the particular age of the Persian kings to
which they belonged, in order that he might discover the names
applicable to the inscription. A reference to the Greek historians
convinced him that he must look for the kings of the dynasty of the
Achæmenides, and he accordingly applied their names to the characters of
the inscriptions. "These names could obviously not be Cyrus and
Cambyses, because the names occurring in the inscriptions do not begin
with the same letter; Cyrus and Artaxerxes were equally inapplicable,
the first being too short and the latter too long; there only remained
therefore the names of Darius and Xerxes;" and these latter agreed so
exactly with the characters, that Mr. Grotefend did not hesitate to
select them. The next step was to ascertain what these names were in the
old Persian language, as they come to us through the Greek, and would of
course differ somewhat from the original. The ancient Zend, as preserved
in the Zendavesta, furnished the only medium through which the desired
information could be obtained.[70] He next ascertained that Xerxes was
called _Kshershe_ or _Ksharsha_; and Darius, _Dareush_. A farther
examination gave him the name of _Kshe_ or _Ksheio_ for 'king.'[71] The
places or groups of characters corresponding with these names, were then
analyzed and the value of each character ascertained. These were then
applied to other portions of the inscriptions, and led to the
translation of two short ones, as well as to the formation of a
considerable portion of the alphabet.
Such was the result of Professor Grotefend's labors up to the year 1833.
His first discovery was made and announced as early as 1802, but an
account of his system of interpretation did not appear until 1815, in
the appendix to the third German edition of Heeren's Researches. This
was afterwards enlarged in the translation of Heeren published at Oxford
in 1833, when it was first made known to English readers. In 1837 he
published a treatise containing an account of all the Persepolitan
inscriptions in his possession, and another in 1840 on those of Babylon.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account